A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Social Enterprise Discussion and Next Collaboration Buzz?

Social Enterprise Discussion and Next Collaboration Buzz?
Oleg
Oleg
3 December, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Collaboration is a tough word. PLM Is using this word all the time. For the last 10-15 years in this industry, I had a chance to see lots of variations on what means collaboration and what will be the next big shift in collaboration. Recently, I started to see multiple attempts to crack the holy grail collaboration using a “social” approach. However, despite the huge success of social networks and web 2.0 website, word “social” is still sound to me a bit fuzzy when applied to enterprise companies.

Yesterday, I’ve seen an announcement from Atalasoft presenting VizIt Social eXchange. Navigate your browser to the following link to learn more. The idea of conversation connected to a specific document in SharePoint make sense. I found a certain similarity between this idea and the original idea of “design discussions” presented by Chris Willams of Vuuch.

Collaboration and Complexity

The complexity is the biggest killer of the everything in the enterprise. Regardless on the future name and buzzwords, tomorrow enterprise systems will need to fight complexity. Social networks and Web 2.0 websites proved some ideas about how to organize and share information in a contextual form to make it very simple. However, manufacturing company is not a photo-sharing website. The complexity of the systems in manufacturing companies is going much beyond the ability of the social networking website.

What is the Meaning of “Social”?

I tried to understand the meaning of a word “social” in the way companies introduce it in their solutions. From what I’ve seen, it seems to me as an additional link between a user information and rest of the data. The amount of data connections in the enterprise organization is big. Implicitly, a connection between user and data does exist in the company.  The attempt of “social systems” is to make this information explicitly available. Make sense to me. So, “social” is just an additional information that can be captured and maintained by social systems.

What is my conclusion? I think “social” is the next buzz about collaboration. People don’t want to listen to the word “collaboration” anymore. This is meaningless. Everybody understands it differently. “Social” ideas are coming from the understanding of Web 2.0 experience and can present a new to people to work together. However, I don’t see a “social” effect as something magical. Users will recognize the pattern – “old software, different names”. So, to make something new and to remove a complexity will be the reality test for social systems.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 October, 2009

Do you know how companies are making decisions about their PLM related strategies? I don’t… Each time I see this...

27 December, 2009

We are coming to the new decade, and I found interesting to drop my thoughts related to what I’d expect...

25 March, 2015

I attended PI Congress in Dusseldorf last month. During the conference I had a chance to share my thoughts about...

10 April, 2020

Earlier this week, another virtual session of CIMdata PLM Market and Industry Forum provided a bunch of interesting ideas and...

28 June, 2016

For many years, customization was one of the key elements of PLM system implementation. It was a step when PLM...

17 August, 2012

I think the agreement about importance of the data model among all implementers of PDM / PLM is almost absolute....

12 February, 2016

If you ask two engineers how to solve a problem, the odds are you can finish with three different solutions....

21 May, 2009

Yesterday, I had the chance to see two deliveries from Jim Brown related to PLM for mid-size companies. ENOVIA SmarTeam...

18 April, 2019

Back last week, I attended COFES 2019 – Congress of the Future of Engineering Software. COFES is a great networking...

Blogroll

To the top