A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

New PLM: From Definition to Realization?

New PLM: From Definition to Realization?
Oleg
Oleg
12 May, 2011 | 3 min for reading

The definition of PLM is one of the topics I’m discussing on blog. I think, in the modern enterprise software, PLM buzzword created a biggest amount of collision, miss interpretation and disputes. I often ask myself what caused such a high level of disagreement? MRP, ERP, CRM… Even SCM – the agreement about these TLAs seems to me smooth. However, each time a discussion comes to PLM, I can hear multiple voices about what it supposed to be and how it supposed to behave.

I read a blog by Chad Jackson on engineering-matters.com called PLM Misnomer What we know it isn’t. Chad took a broad review of what PLM is based on Wikipedia’s definition of a product lifecycle. These are my two favorite passages from Chad’s blog:

(PLM…) definitions can vary quite dramatically. And personally, I don’t have any problem with that. However, in response to a tweet questioning the definition of PLM, I saw a tweet along the following lines: the definition of PLM is simple, it’s what manages the lifecycle of the product! And I have to say, I completely disagree. From my perspective, PLM systems don’t begin to address the entire lifecycle of the product.

PLM systems don’t really manage the product’s entire lifecycle. It is a front-end oriented system more related to concepts and detailed design.

Two Engineers – Three Opinions

Engineering and Manufacturing. Different opinions. If you had a chance to attend meetings in manufacturing companies, you can see how complicated to come to a single conclusion. You can do things this way, but you can also approach some alternatives. This is not about money – this is about engineering. When software engineering (vendors) crosses paths with manufacturing (customers), the results are unpredictable. This is what happened to the most of CAD/PLM vendors when they started to develop complex systems for large OEMs in automotive and aerospace industries. Most of today PLM systems are having roots in this development.

If I had more time, I’d write a shorter story…

This is one of my best quotes by Mark Twain. If I’d apply it to development of software I’d say – it is easy to develop something complicated. It is damn hard to develop something simple. I think, an attempt to provide a complicated and exhaustive definition of PLM (as well as complex product suites) is a core of the problem. The diverse set of functionality required by manufacturing companies pushed vendor to add more and more modules (and functions) to their products. So, they became big, complicated and expensive. The idea of business apps presented by Dion Hinchliffe is interesting in my view. Take a look on the following conceptual diagram of Business Apps.

What is my conclusion? PLM is complicated because it touches one of the most sensitive elements of a manufacturing company – the way this specific company runs their development and manufacturing. Every company developed their own processes. PLM companies passed the way from development of a toolkit to gigantic systems with lots of functions and features. Industry had enough time to think. In my view, now it is a time find how to create a “short story” about how to realize PLM ideas in a scalable, but not complicated way.

Just my thoughts…

Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 January, 2018

In a lexicon of CAD and PLM marketing “intuitive” talk is cheap. You can find it everywhere. Google “intuitive PLM”...

19 July, 2016

Until now we had enough said about “cloud”. While PLM vendors are still disputing what is a true and false...

9 July, 2009

The following press release two days ago drove my attention. Kalypso, the world’s premier innovation consulting firm, announces the launch...

31 March, 2017

Disruption is the hallmark of modern technology world. We are thinking and talking about it all the time. One of...

20 June, 2012

Well… It happened. Microsoft officially became “hardware company”. Keyboards, mice, even XBOX and Kinect… All these devices are in a...

7 October, 2017

Dear Readers, This is a beginning of guest blogging on Beyond PLM. I welcome everyone to share your thoughts about...

24 July, 2022

SaaS is growing and I can see every day how manufacturing companies are adopting SaaS solutions. What was a vision...

28 January, 2012

What do you think about the future designer workspace? I assume some of my readers remember drawing board in multiple...

4 May, 2025

Back in 1992, Bill Clinton’s campaign faced a tough political climate. His team needed a simple, focused message to cut...

Blogroll

To the top