A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Google vs. Microsoft at General Motors: What does it mean for PLM Cloud?

Google vs. Microsoft at General Motors: What does it mean for PLM Cloud?
Oleg
Oleg
17 November, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Cloud big time… It is probably coming to General Motors. Google is fighting against Microsoft to supply 100’00 license deal for GM. Navigate your browser to the following article – GM is the latest battleground between Microsoft Office and Google Apps. Read the story. Automaker is running 100’000 seats of Notes. Will the number moves to Google or Microsoft? The following passage is interesting:

If GM were to deploy Google Apps to the 100,000 seats it has apparently contracted to study, it would be a huge win for Google. No other customer approaches that scale: The City of Los Angeles signed a contract for 30,000 Google Apps seats two years ago, but only 17,000 seats have been rolled out, with the LAPD still stalling. Genentech has about 15,000 users; KLM about 11,000 users, Valeo about 30,000, the U.S. General Services Administration about 17,000, and Rentokil about 35,000.

Think about the numbers. Also, think about other customers mentioned above. Does it ring the bell? I think it does.

How PLM software vendors can leverage Google Cloud?

It is always good if somebody fights your fight. The story about Google vs. Microsoft GM Cloud fight made me think about what PLM vendors got to do with regards to this? Companies like GM are very conservative. You need to spend a huge deal of money to convince behemoths to change their strategies. Assuming Google will convince GM and other automotive companies to shift towards Google App from Microsoft SharePoint and Office. It can turn up an opportunity window for PLM and other engineering and manufacturing solution providers into GM-like deals. Is it going to work? I think, it is hard to say, for the moment. However, long term Google has a huge potential. Will Microsoft be ready to protect their home turf? I’m sure they will. It will come as a bundle of W8, Skype, Office and other solutions. They have a chance to keep the territory.

What is my conclusion? The battle about cloud solutions is still in the future. PLM companies are trying shallow water by playing cloud with a small amount of customers. For most of them, it is about how to check technologies and solutions. Company like DS already spent huge chunks of money for R&D cloud efforts. Autodesk is still preparing to come to PLM space and surprise everybody. It is not much known about Siemens and PTC. In the past CAD/PLM companies leveraged their partnership with Microsoft, IBM and other large technological partners. How to choose the right partner for the future cloud battle is a good  question to ask. Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 May, 2010

Technology and products are not always going together. What is the most fascinating to me is to see how technological...

21 January, 2009

Collaboration and Process Management is obviously a very important part of Product Lifecycle Management. But does it really target successful...

30 December, 2018

End of the year is a time to look into a crystal ball and say what is going to happen....

15 January, 2013

I would like to speak about PDM today. You can hardly find engineers that like data management. For many years,...

15 November, 2011

Process vs. Data. I think, this topic not requires a special introduction. In my view, every PLM implementation is facing...

22 May, 2009

Look on this blog post –3D Warehouse from Google. Does it make sense in context of what CAD/PLM vendors are...

31 July, 2018

Digital transformation is the process of fundamental changes of business and product development activities, processes processes and all manufacturing company...

11 June, 2015

  Version control is one of the most important function in PDM. Regardless on what type of data you are managing,...

30 December, 2014

One size doesn’t fit all. We know that. Engineers are using multiple tools. Shifting context is complex. For years, CAD...

Blogroll

To the top