A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The Ugly Truth of Multi-BOM Management

The Ugly Truth of Multi-BOM Management
Oleg
Oleg
17 December, 2013 | 3 min for reading

multiple-bom-ugly-truth

Bill of Material (BOM) management is always fascinating topic. It sparks so many debates and introduce a large set of diverse opinions. I can even say that I have a special passion to speak about BOM on my blog. If you want to catch up on my recent posts about BOM, you can try these few links – Will PLM manage enterprise BOM? and Will SaaS and Open API solve BOM management problems? My special passion is “single BOM”. I started this conversation few years ago. Here is my last writeup about single BOM- Single BOM in 6 steps.

Few days ago, my attention was caught by PLM dojo article about pros and cons is Multiple BOM management – Why You Should (or Shouldn’t) use Multiple BOMs. I highly recommend you to have a read the article including comments (the number is growing). It brings an interesting set of strategies relasted to BOM management. From my side, I can clearly see advantages of both approaches. And I can generally say it depends on many factors – industry, product, organization, processes and… (what is not less important) people. Here is my favorite passage:

Sometimes it makes sense for the CAD user to organize the design differently than how ERP organizes the data. For example, it might make sense to group a large assembly model into sub-assemblies that don’t represent any actual part, but make it easier to divide up work on the overall structure. A related reason is that having the part BOM separate from the CAD BOM isolates the part BOM from the inevitable messiness of the CAD files.

While there is nothing wrong in division and separation of CAD design and Part structures, I still believe there is a trick here. Thinking about that, took me back to the post I wrote few years ago – The Ugly Truth About PLM-ERP Monkey Volleyball  The controlling of data is one of the fundamental enterprise software behavior and strategy. One of the “negative” aspects of single BOM strategies is the need (and complexity) to share responsibilities and control over the shared “single BOM”. It can create lots of organizational constraints, especially if departments and/or divisions are using multiple systems.

At the same time, Single BOM containing multiple dimensions of product information can become a place to share data among organization and optimize processes. However, in order to make it happen organization will have to agree how to manage “shared space”, and shared responsibilities. People management becomes a critical function to make it successful.

What is my conclusion? Technology is easy part, but people are really hard.  This is one of my favorite quotes. The ugly truth of BOM management is the fact it requires people management and agreement across organization. Multiple BOM can be done using separation and data island controlling. Very often you can hear about technological challenges of single BOM organization. Much rare situation is when organization is moving to people and organizational constraints. People’s ego and organizational issues are often playing a key role in decision to go with one of BOM management strategies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 May, 2020

The use of the term “PLM” might have worn out its welcome says Peter Bilello, president of CIMdata analyst and...

8 February, 2016

The decisions about PLM system selection and implementation are slow. I took part in few of them during my last...

24 June, 2021

CAD and PLM companies are on the run towards the cloud. Each company has its own journey, stories, strategies, and...

17 July, 2015

The strongest community wins. Thanks Ed Lopategui for reminding this very important thing in your last GrabCAD blog – . It certainly...

15 August, 2019

It has been a little bit over a decade since I started to write my PLM blog. Started with a...

15 May, 2010

This is a weekend post. I was trying to find a way to present in one page what I’m blogging...

2 May, 2014

Product Data Management (PDM) was around for the last 20-30 years. However, I can see an increased traction around PDM...

3 February, 2014

My attention was caught this weekend by thedailybeast article with funny title – Why Big Data Doesn’t Live up to...

12 November, 2023

We live in a digital world. It doesn’t matter what we do and what business we are in, getting information...

Blogroll

To the top