A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Lifestream Concept for PLM Applications

Lifestream Concept for PLM Applications
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
13 March, 2009 | 2 min for reading

As you know, new ideas often come from things already forgotten… Therefore, I like looking at research projects and experimental products as they are good ways to find some fresh ideas. A few days ago, I was looking at the Lifestream application created by Gelernter 1994; Freeman 1997. 


lifestream

 

Another predecessor and association is Malone’s influential study – “How Do People Organize Their Desks?” (1983). I found some very interesting concepts that, in my opinion, can be valuable for Product Lifecycle Management. What particularly caught my attention was the association between lifecycle and Lifestream. Actually, in regards to lifecycles, I think that we are very disconnected from representation of time in PLM applications.

lifestream

 Lifestream is about time. Originally, the proposed approach was to throw away filenames, folders and static filling and replace it with stream of information arranged according to time. Actually after the implementation of Lifestream, some of its features were found in Apple iApps and other commercial products.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n055CqFnjyo]

While terms such as file/folders/desktop are brilliant, but Lifestream focused on the non-traditional aspects of information management, which is not typical for regular computer users. On the same point, I think PLM is different as a good concept of managing of product data that needs to be invented.

The Lifestream model is about to create, organize and present timelines. Whereas timelines may have different representations – collections, calendars or queries, this model would eliminate all other artificial models that people need to create in order to store product information. It’s interesting that this model would allow you to use a “time oriented” memory. An additional benefit of this approach is that the timescale lets you use the same model to manage tasks by leveraging future timelines. Appropriated information “tagged with future date/time” would appear in the scope of the system whereby the user would get this information as an alert.

lifestream-homepage

I think this is definitely an interesting concept that requires additional research and validation with users. I’d be glad to hear your comments and thoughts. 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 June, 2010

My post Open vs. Closed PLM Debates last week and related Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt –...

23 March, 2015

Here is the passage I captured during my weekend reading – We only sleep at night because Facebook, Google, Apple,...

11 September, 2022

The level of integration in the manufacturing industry is growing. The last decade of advanced manufacturing development demonstrated that setting...

30 January, 2012

Cloud is hyping in 2012. Coming Facebook IPO can only supercharge the future of cloud computing. Last year Autodesk announcement...

2 November, 2009

My new blog post on 3D PERSPECTIVES. I hope you’ll enjoy the historical perspective on 3D software usage from Dassault...

29 July, 2009

Thinking in loud. I’m looking over many user interfaces of PLM systems and reading “Don’t make me think“. Why every...

3 October, 2020

A single source of truth is the paradigm that sells PLM and many other systems. PDM and PLM providers used...

18 April, 2018

I’m continue to share my comments after COFES 2018, which took place in Scottsdale, AZ last week. Yesterday, I shared...

4 November, 2015

Part numbers. This is probably one of the most discussed topic in manufacturing and related software domains. How to define...

Blogroll

To the top