A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Lifestream Concept for PLM Applications

Lifestream Concept for PLM Applications
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
13 March, 2009 | 2 min for reading

As you know, new ideas often come from things already forgotten… Therefore, I like looking at research projects and experimental products as they are good ways to find some fresh ideas. A few days ago, I was looking at the Lifestream application created by Gelernter 1994; Freeman 1997. 


lifestream

 

Another predecessor and association is Malone’s influential study – “How Do People Organize Their Desks?” (1983). I found some very interesting concepts that, in my opinion, can be valuable for Product Lifecycle Management. What particularly caught my attention was the association between lifecycle and Lifestream. Actually, in regards to lifecycles, I think that we are very disconnected from representation of time in PLM applications.

lifestream

 Lifestream is about time. Originally, the proposed approach was to throw away filenames, folders and static filling and replace it with stream of information arranged according to time. Actually after the implementation of Lifestream, some of its features were found in Apple iApps and other commercial products.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n055CqFnjyo]

While terms such as file/folders/desktop are brilliant, but Lifestream focused on the non-traditional aspects of information management, which is not typical for regular computer users. On the same point, I think PLM is different as a good concept of managing of product data that needs to be invented.

The Lifestream model is about to create, organize and present timelines. Whereas timelines may have different representations – collections, calendars or queries, this model would eliminate all other artificial models that people need to create in order to store product information. It’s interesting that this model would allow you to use a “time oriented” memory. An additional benefit of this approach is that the timescale lets you use the same model to manage tasks by leveraging future timelines. Appropriated information “tagged with future date/time” would appear in the scope of the system whereby the user would get this information as an alert.

lifestream-homepage

I think this is definitely an interesting concept that requires additional research and validation with users. I’d be glad to hear your comments and thoughts. 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 February, 2014

My attention was caught this weekend by thedailybeast article with funny title – Why Big Data Doesn’t Live up to...

28 July, 2009

My short conclusion after very productive discussion about how to move PLM to mainstream. First of all, I enjoyed it...

4 July, 2024

As we are at the midpoint of 2024, it is a good time to take a look at PLM vendors...

6 February, 2025

A few days ago, I wrote about Data Products. It’s an interesting trend that, in my view, can push new...

23 January, 2015

Integration of CAD and PDM is a field with long history of battles, innovation and failures for the last 15-20...

11 July, 2011

Autodesk and PLM. Do you think these two words have something in common? I had a chance to discuss this...

19 October, 2018

Agreement is a hard when it comes to PLM. Ask 3 people about what is PLM and you most probably...

18 May, 2009

Short news alert – Cordys enables business process automation for Google Apps. Jan Baan, founder and CEO of Cordys said...

19 June, 2015

I like links. The things about links are fascinating. It is about connection between products, people, companies and things. The...

Blogroll

To the top