A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to Extend PLM Reach – Process vs. Content?

How to Extend PLM Reach – Process vs. Content?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
22 June, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I was reading a review <PLM Extends Reach in Product Development> over the weekend. My short conclusion – PLM is growing, expanding its horizons and reach in different areas of product development. Jill Jusko quoted many analysts from Forrester and CIMData, as well as vendors such as PTC. They explained how PLM is growing in different areas of corporate activities (such as social collaboration and the product value chain). So, I tried to figure out where we need to go and how to prioritize PLM development to reach a wider audience with a Product Lifecycle Management solution.

My conclusion actually was very short, so I’d like share it with you: PLM has two major opportunities to reach within and beyond the organization:

(1)    To extend Content

(2)    To extend Processes

I will try to explain what I mean. With my very pragmatic state of mind, I tried to analyze the current PLM organizational positions. PLM providers with roots in design and 3D (and this is the majority of PLM mind-shares) are deeply engaged in the business of CAD modeling and 3D. So, PLM of these companies do well in initial product creation. But what happens afterwards? In most of the cases, 3D is going to die. Most of the information is translated into PDF, paper and/or other alternatives to original 3D. Therefore, the 3D PLM content will disappear. This is definitely a bad situation for PLM providers. So, regarding my first clause – to extend PLM reach – companies need to invest more in content-availability. As soon as this is done, more people will be able to leverage original valuable PLM 3D information. In parallel, we have an alternative – processes. Many companies, including PLM vendors, and especially their ERP patrons, involved in different areas, are encouraging customers to share their process difficulties. So, this alternative is to transform business processes and implement various initiatives (from complex business orchestrations, and down to workflow automation). In my opinion, this is definitely a second option for extending PLM reach.

What is my short conclusion? I’m  a believer in data. In my view, data is much important compared to process. So, I’d expect that extending PLM successfully would start  when the PLM system gains more share from the PLM data (content) management extension. Extending capabilities to manage, share and collaborate on more data will  ultimately pave a successful path for manufacturing companies.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 December, 2009

The following NYT article drove my attention yesterday – Open Source as a Model for Business is Elusive. I already...

28 October, 2016

Manufacturing companies are learning about the value of data assets. For the last few years, we have seen a tremendous interest...

11 March, 2009

We live in a physical world. Everything in this world seems to be created in a parallel, virtual space. This...

31 July, 2021

I was talking to a manufacturing company earlier this week and they asked me a question – we just purchased...

28 April, 2009

There is no doubt a search changed the way we work today on the Internet. Remember how looked for  information...

18 June, 2013

Data is a fascinating topic these days. The amount of data is growing and it raises lots of concerns on...

15 March, 2022

Manufacturing companies are under pressure to transform their operations to stay competitive. It includes changes in business models, turning data...

22 September, 2017

Industry is transforming these days. As part of business transformation, engineering and manufacturing software vendors are changing the way software...

28 June, 2013

App Store. These two words changed our life for the last few years. You have a problem? We have an...

Blogroll

To the top