A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to Extend PLM Reach – Process vs. Content?

How to Extend PLM Reach – Process vs. Content?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
22 June, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I was reading a review <PLM Extends Reach in Product Development> over the weekend. My short conclusion – PLM is growing, expanding its horizons and reach in different areas of product development. Jill Jusko quoted many analysts from Forrester and CIMData, as well as vendors such as PTC. They explained how PLM is growing in different areas of corporate activities (such as social collaboration and the product value chain). So, I tried to figure out where we need to go and how to prioritize PLM development to reach a wider audience with a Product Lifecycle Management solution.

My conclusion actually was very short, so I’d like share it with you: PLM has two major opportunities to reach within and beyond the organization:

(1)    To extend Content

(2)    To extend Processes

I will try to explain what I mean. With my very pragmatic state of mind, I tried to analyze the current PLM organizational positions. PLM providers with roots in design and 3D (and this is the majority of PLM mind-shares) are deeply engaged in the business of CAD modeling and 3D. So, PLM of these companies do well in initial product creation. But what happens afterwards? In most of the cases, 3D is going to die. Most of the information is translated into PDF, paper and/or other alternatives to original 3D. Therefore, the 3D PLM content will disappear. This is definitely a bad situation for PLM providers. So, regarding my first clause – to extend PLM reach – companies need to invest more in content-availability. As soon as this is done, more people will be able to leverage original valuable PLM 3D information. In parallel, we have an alternative – processes. Many companies, including PLM vendors, and especially their ERP patrons, involved in different areas, are encouraging customers to share their process difficulties. So, this alternative is to transform business processes and implement various initiatives (from complex business orchestrations, and down to workflow automation). In my opinion, this is definitely a second option for extending PLM reach.

What is my short conclusion? I’m  a believer in data. In my view, data is much important compared to process. So, I’d expect that extending PLM successfully would start  when the PLM system gains more share from the PLM data (content) management extension. Extending capabilities to manage, share and collaborate on more data will  ultimately pave a successful path for manufacturing companies.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 August, 2009

I was reading Gartner research showing that BPM (Business Process Management) is rising despite the turbulent time and bad financial...

18 June, 2023

PLM projects are famous for their complexity and failures. How to turn your PLM implementations from a state of uncertainty...

8 December, 2019

It has been more than a month since PTC acquired Onshape. Such a big event triggered many conversations about the...

24 April, 2020

Microsoft Azure blog brings the story about how PTC and Azure partnership empowers industrial organizations. Check out the article –...

15 November, 2017

Many years ago, I had a customer who asked me to develop “one button” data management application. I made a...

19 May, 2014

In the beginning was CAD and CAD was the only important system for engineers. Then came PDM… In my view,...

27 May, 2019

PLM industry has a problem. It called legacy data migrations and updates. The stories about migrating data and systems are...

5 August, 2010

It becomes very common to use Wikipedia for most research projects. It becomes an ultimate source of information open for everybody....

18 January, 2025

Earlier this week, I read an article by Josef Schöttner discussing PLM software Integration Solutions. You can find the article...

Blogroll

To the top