A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM and MDM – How to start right?

PLM and MDM – How to start right?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
18 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Product Lifecycle Management and Master Data Management. I had chance to raise this issue few months ago in my post Will Master Data Management Work for PLM? Few days ago, interesting publication from Gartner about their research in area of MDM and, more specifically, about overlap between MDM and PLM. Andrew White together with Marc Halpern published paper called “Interfacing of PLM and MDM for cross enterprise needs”. The conclusion made by Andrew in his blog article is simple – use a right tool for the right job.
In more detailed way, they explained PLM itself as a not mature software category in comparison to ERP, SCM, CRM etc. With lack of maturity and unclear agreed position and usage of MDM, PDM, PLM prevented earlier exploration of intersection between these domains.

gartner-mdm-white

Now, I’d like to come back to my initial question – how to start right? What is my concern about approach “right tool for right job”? As soon as we speak about corporate and enterprise data and product IP/Knowledge, I think this approach may not work. Today’s enterprise is very siloed, information span across multiple systems – engineering, manufacturing, procurement, supply chain. As soon as a system identify in the particular functional domain, it will not create major conflicts. I see relatively simple approach to position PDM as a system to manage design and engineering data only together with Master Data Management. However, when we come to PLM approach, I see definitely conflict of interest. In my view PLM and MDM strategy has similarity in their approaches to create “single point of truth” in organization.

So, what I see as a possible PLM/MDM strategy? I think, MDM strategy and infrastructure, can provide possible foundation for managing of non-transactional data for product development. This data can be accumulated by MDM and saved for future usage. Today’s PLM implementations are mostly focused around product development, so such MDM infrastructure can be good asset PLM can use to achieve long term data retention and other data management needs. At the same time, such approach can bring significant investment into both PLM and MDM systems and probably can be acceptable only by large enterprises.

I’m interested in discussion, if you had any experience with MDM and PLM system co-existence.
Best regards,
Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 November, 2016

I’m at AU2016 this week. Yesterday, I had a chance to attend Autodesk Forge Dev Day. It is a  gathering...

8 August, 2018

One of the readers of my blog, raised the topic of PLM for SMB. Long time ago I was working...

9 March, 2016

PI Munich event is over. Now it is the time to digest information, scroll through the notes, tweets and business cards....

30 May, 2010

I read an interesting note from Autodesk Labs. Inventor 2011 now available for trials via the cloud. It made me...

6 February, 2024

The Bill of Materials (BOM) stands as a pivotal yet contentious subject within the space of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM),...

1 April, 2022

I’m coming from the first in-person PLM conference that happened yesterday in Ann Arbor, MI. It was a great place...

30 April, 2012

I’m off to Detroit, MI this week for Aras PLM user conference – ACE 2012. Microsoft .NET and MS SQL are...

21 June, 2025

Earlier this week, I read a post by Andreas Lindenthal. He speaks about problems PLM can solve and he goes...

28 January, 2015

Cloud is trending and it is hard to find a company who is not thinking how to leverage new cloud...

Blogroll

To the top