A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Do We Need Reporting Standards in PLM?

Do We Need Reporting Standards in PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I want to raise discussion about reporting in PLM. We don’t see it much in marketing materials about PLM. I asked myself why? Maybe in there is no need for reports? Maybe the way to present report is obsolete and people are interested to see information by using normal UI of PLM and other systems? If it is so, why so many customers are in love from their “PLM Excels” with all information presented in cells and rows? My hunch is that we have a problem here… Yesterday I had chance to read blog by Joe Barkai about PLM and Sustainability, which led me to some reporting standards initiatives. So, it was a trigger to investigate it more in deep.

Reports in PDM/PLM systems
In my view, reports in PDM and PLM systems are on the very primitive level. Technologically, they seem as an obvious and during evaluation, customers, are ending up by the conclusion that all is possible, and they can extract, re-format, modify data when they will be a real need to do so. However, in practice, reports are rarely coming to the agenda of implementers (correct me, please, if I’m wrong), since normally, they’re so much other things to do…

Hidden Loss
The problem, I see that absence of reporting capabilities is not allowing to the customers to get information about a product in a timely manner and in a readable form. When user interfaces are complicated, most of the users that might be interested to see information, actually cannot put their hands on it.

Is there a place for Reporting Standards?
I don’t see any standard activity in this place, for the moment. However, getting back to IDC blog post,  as much as we can see growing regulation activities, I’d expect increases in potential to establish reporting standards. So, requests for reports will come from regulators. In these case , regulations, will play a role of the trigger in establishing of reporting standards.

What is my conclusion? In my view, reporting capabilities are undervalued by PLM systems today. PLM vendors see reports as a commodity with low value. The reporting activities for the best are part of PLM services and/or implementers. However, looking again, I’d expect to grow an interest from customers to have the ability to provide reports based on data we have in PLM systems. What do you think? What was your “reporting” experience with PLM?

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
4 February, 2016

It became a cliche for the last few years to compare everything with Uber and Airbnb. I have to admit...

20 August, 2010

The following publication in VEKTORRUM got me to review again a book “3D Manufacturing Innovation” by Dr. Hiroshi Toriya. I...

25 August, 2010

I’m continuing to explore various aspects of relations between PLM and social systems and tools in my blog. The social...

20 January, 2016

Workflows is one of the fundamental elements of all PLM products today. Workflow abstraction is easy to understand to engineers...

6 July, 2010

Product-related data is one of the most important aspects of any PLM implementation. When you talk about PLM implementation, the...

6 October, 2010

Yesterday, I touched a topic of connection between CAD and PLM. The discussion started by Peter Schroer of Aras and...

13 June, 2012

Mobile is fascinating these days. The growth rates are amazing. Learning from publicly available sources, the growth of mobile internet...

9 September, 2010

I can see a growing interest of PLM providers to explore the story of enterprise search. This morning I’ve seen...

15 February, 2017

Complexity is a big deal in PLM. Because all PLM systems available today in the market are crazy complex. Talk...

Blogroll

To the top