A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The Future Of PLM Walmarting

The Future Of PLM Walmarting
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
18 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Say “PLM” to anyone, and you hear the words “complex” and “expensive”. However, thinking about trajectories of different technologies, I came to the conclusion that it always introduced as something very expensive and then going down to become cheaper and, in the end, even free. It was a story of so many technological inventions in many industries. There are many outside of PLM examples. The most valuable insider’s stories related to the evolution of CAD systems. Even in the data management domain, we can definitely see a trend to move from expensive custom-built PDM systems to windows-based mid-priced solutions. It gave a certain push in the adoption level and allowed to “non-Boeing” customers to come and taste these products and technologies.

The Parallel History of CAD/PLM and Walmart
Let’s take an unusual look on how companies and product can grow within time. Let’s take a look first on the very interesting video of WalMarts growth across United States from 1964 until 2007. I think this video is amazing and shows viral WalMart distribution. You can take a look on the interactive map following this link.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbYnkg6wYSI]

Now let’s take a look on the following framgment. “This video is a TV show made about the software Ivan Sutherland developed in his 1963 thesis at MIT’s Lincoln Labs, “Sketchpad, A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System”, described as one of the most influential computer programs ever written. This work was seminal in Human-Computer Interaction, Graphics and Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs), Computer Aided Design (CAD), and contraint/object-oriented programming“. These are definite roots of CAD and PLM.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USyoT_Ha_bA]

The Future Is PLM Walmarting
In my view, there is a very interesting paradox related to PLM. I can see Product Lifecycle Management ideas as a vision and practical guidance about how to manage product from their entire life. These ideas are getting good acceptance from many people in the organizations. At the same time, as soon as discussion is going towards software and vendors, I can hear much more negative context about what PLM can and cannot do. Here is my point – to walmart PLM! It needs to be done easy, cheaper, simpler. It needs to be open and available. It needs to solve initially the subset of problems that relevant to everybody and not requires implementation time.

What is my conclusion today? I love Wal-Mart’s mission statement: “To give ordinary folk the chance to buy the same thing as rich people“. I’d like to think about a direction toward the future of PLM – To give all engineers the chance to buy and use the same software as Boeing, Toyota, Honda, Airbus… I don’t think it is about people and methodology. They will not learn how to use complicated software. This is about software…

Just my thought.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 January, 2013

Last week, I started the conversation about Bill of Materials and modern challenges. BOM is a heavy topic. Previous blog...

6 July, 2009

Short prompt. Reading interesting announcement – SAP and RIM Usher In a New Era for Enterprise Mobility. I think mobile...

18 March, 2023

Let’s continue the conversation about PLM and AI that started last week. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Chat GPT have been...

7 August, 2020

Unless you lived under the rock for the last few years, you’ve heard about Digital Twin. Wikipedia article gives a...

31 October, 2017

Engineering.com article – A Big Win as Yamaha “Does a Daimler” and Chooses Siemens PLM brings up big debates about Dassault...

18 May, 2011

This evening I had pre-meeting talks in Eurostep office located in Stockholm neighborhood. In preparation for the Eurostep 2011 event,...

26 April, 2017

Manufacturing is under going tremendous transformation process. Build to order, speed and engagement with consumer are most important competitive factors....

3 October, 2018

I spent today at Develop3D Live Boston. The event is focusing on engineering and design space and organized by Develop3D...

10 November, 2014

Engineering.com article by Verdi Ogewell earlier today is introducing a next step of PLM vs. ERP battle for ownership of...

Blogroll

To the top