A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

CAD-less PLM Puzzle

CAD-less PLM Puzzle
Oleg
Oleg
14 December, 2010 | 3 min for reading

Ask people about the connection between CAD and PLM and you will discover a very interesting thing. In the past people draw a bold line connection CAD and PLM environment. The connection between CAD and PLM is not very strong. CAD was considered as a founding layer in all PLM strategies, today impose lots of restrictions and complications in the implementation of PLM strategies.

CAD Foundation Layer

CAD data management is one of the historical roots of modern PLM. It was very straightforward to start everything with CAD. The starting pitch was to take CAD data under control. CAD provides the initial point and source of design information in the organization. Many PDM and PLM companies used to implement CAD integration modules first and then expanded the offering beyond this point. It was also an easy part to get into manufacturing organizations via people involved into design and CAD.

Business Processes

The opposite side of PLM development actually was to think more about product development and organizational processes. In the beginning, it was very ERP-ish to think about PLM as a “process management story”. However, more people started to see processes, change management, quality management and other similar, but disconnected from CAD topics as an important trend in their PLM strategies.

Connecting Dots

One of the important aspects of a product development process is to be able to connect dots between different departments in an organization. These days you cannot optimize product development without analyzing various aspects of product development – design, engineering, manufacturing, sales support. CAD is one of the elements in this chain. You cannot take CAD out of the overall product development story. However, to balance between strong dependencies on CAD and process optimization seems to me a right path to go.

PLM New Entrants

There are not many new entrants in the PLM world. Very few new companies were started in this space for the last decade. There is one very important question you need to ask. How much effort and focus new PLM company need to spend around the CAD? I don’t think there is a clear answer. Few new companies in the PLM world started completely disconnected from CAD and, later, discovered a need to put their hands into CAD-related stuff. Those companies that kept their eyes open to CAD world were more successful in the past. Industry is also an important aspect when you think about your CAD-roots.

What is my conclusion? CAD is obviously important. It represents a lot of IP in every manufacturing organization. It is hard to think how you can effectively manage a product lifecycle without putting your hands deeply inside of what people are doing in CAD. However, the technological aspects of CAD data management are very complicated. CAD vendors are playing hard to keep CAD as their competitive instrument, which creates additional entry barriers in front of new PLM development initiatives. Do you think CAD-less PLM has a future? An important question to ask, in my view.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 April, 2021

During the last few days, I’ve been getting many questions about Autodesk and Upchain. Thanks to all my online and...

12 February, 2016

If you ask two engineers how to solve a problem, the odds are you can finish with three different solutions....

28 April, 2024

In the world of engineering and product lifecycle management (PLM), Excel and other forms of spreadsheets have long been well...

9 March, 2009

I’ve been observing a significant increase in the availability of personal services in today’s software and solution offerings. Many examples...

10 June, 2021

I’ve been following Autodesk’s last move in the PLM business – Upchain acquisition. The first preliminary assessment was based on...

14 October, 2016

Engineering.com webinar with fascinating name – Not your father’s PLM by Chad Jackson of Lifecycle Insight reminded me the textbook example...

1 April, 2015

CIMdata PLM forum yesterday was a good place to discuss ideas that from a first look can sound a bit...

11 December, 2012

Scaling globally is one of the biggest challenges for manufacturing organizations. For many years, enterprise software used as a basic...

15 May, 2023

The topic of “intelligent part numbers” (IPN) came across again. This time it caught my attention via the post on...

Blogroll

To the top