A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Old Browsers and the Impact on Cloud PLM

Old Browsers and the Impact on Cloud PLM
Oleg
Oleg
15 July, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I made my weekly social media catch up during the weekend. The following topic caught my attention. Google recently started to show some muscles to other browser players. Google Apps require newest browsers to run, and Google drops support for older versions and some browsers completely. Here is the evidence. Google blog – Our plans are to support modern browsers. Another one – Google drops support for old browser. And one more about drop to support Opera – Google service drop support for Opera. While I’m not Opera user, I found the following passage interesting:

According to the official Gmail Blog, Google will drop support for the following browsers and their predecessors: Firefox 3.5, Internet Explorer 7 and Safari 3. Dropping support does not mean that users will be blocked from using Google services, but it does mean that Google may develop and implement features that no longer work in those browsers.

It made me think about what browsers are in use in manufacturing companies and how it can potentially influence future development of cloud apps and specifically cloud PLM systems. I started from trying to understand what are current browser requirements from some of available cloud systems in CAD and PLM – Arena PLM, Autodesk PLM 360 and SolidWorks n!Fuze. Unfortunately, none of these systems didn’t provide upfront the information about supported browsers. I also believe that IE 7.0 is still quite popular in manufacturing companies. At least, I can see it fairly often.

Performance and Security

These are two issues that need to stand on the top of the list when discussing web browser support. Recently, I’ve seen an interesting comparison made by PTC about Windchill performance in different browsers. Newer browsers allow much better performance and variety of optimization. Another issue is security –  obsolete browsers are providing considerably more opportunities to security breaches.

What is my conclusion? I think web technologies are moving forward much faster than IT stack of manufacturing companies and other enterprises. Features, performance, security – this is only short list of issues. The question of browser support will become a significant topic standing between cloud PLM providers and their customers. To understand how to balance between minimum supported version and the ability of enterprise IT to move fast to new browser version will become a challenge very soon. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

pic courtesy themacobserver

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
30 August, 2010

I’m continuing discussions about PDM vs. PLM differences. I’d encourage you to take a look on my previous two posts...

14 October, 2011

Yesterday I spent my day on Dassault PLM Forum in Moscow. The event website is here. You can see the...

13 January, 2016

Back to New Year celebration, I bought the iTwinkle Light made by GE in Home Depot. It has many features, connects...

21 February, 2011

Sometime data management Q&A looks funny. World Online Review published the following solution on the request about how to migrate...

26 August, 2010

I read one of the latest VEKTORRUM re-posts about Autodesk and PLM. Navigate your browser to the following link and read...

15 May, 2010

This is a weekend post. I was trying to find a way to present in one page what I’m blogging...

5 December, 2020

You can’t sit in two chairs with one butt. Well, Siemens’s SaaS strategy says you actually can. TeamcenterX SaaS strategy...

9 August, 2019

One of the most commonly used PLM sales scenarios is to sell it as an expansion of existing PDM system....

3 January, 2018

Believe it or not, each manufacturing company has PLM. If your company is in the business of design, product development...

Blogroll

To the top