A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Implementation Lifecycle Challenges

PLM Implementation Lifecycle Challenges
Oleg
Oleg
13 March, 2013 | 3 min for reading

Implementation of enterprise information systems is a long and painful process. It requires a lot of efforts, investments and planning. ERP and other enterprise backbone technologies (eg Oracle) are good examples. In my view, PLM comes to the same list as Oracle. Yesterday, I had a chance to read CW article – Oracle Blasts Forrester Report On Fusion Applications Adoption. Spend few minutes and read that. Forrester research made a suggestion that Oracle’s customers won’t be interested to update to new Fusion Applications. Forrester defines it as a strategic dilemma – Oracle makes a lot of money from old product lines and at the same time, not many customers are adopting new stuff and tech like Fusion. Oracle criticized Forrester research. Here is a key passage to me –

Oracle has taken a “co-existence” approach to pushing Fusion Applications, wherein an installed base customer would use some Fusion modules alongside their existing E-Business Suite or PeopleSoft implementation. While Forrester mentioned the co-existence concept in its report, in Oracle’s view the research firm gave it short shrift. “Customers can adopt modules of Oracle Fusion Applications incrementally and at their own pace to co-exist with their existing deployments. Never have we forced existing customers to move/migrate out of Oracle Applications Unlimited to adopt Oracle Fusion Applications,” the response states. “Customers may not know what to do in the context of their specific implementation as each deployment is more or less specific, but Oracle’s strategy is very clear. We do not have a dilemma.” Forrester also failed to adequately acknowledge the investments Oracle is making in its Applications Unlimited products, which include planned future releases and “long lists of enhancements,” according to the response.

I found some similarity between Oracle implementation lifecycle and PLM implementations. One of the critical elements of PLM technologies and products is PLM adoption. It takes time to implement and start using PLM in an organization. Earlier this year, I attended PI Congress in Berlin where I had a chance to watch many customer presentations. I called them “big mono-PLM” projects. Every implementation is multi-year, project with a significant budget and long lifecycle. Once implemented in a company, it can be used for a long period of time. However, to maintain it and to upgrade to another system versions is very complicated. If you look over the landscape of existing PLM implementations, you can discover a variety of product, versions and technologies coming from PLM vendors for the last 15-20 years. Because of long implementation cycle and high cost, once implemented, PLM systems live very long lifecycle. Sometimes, it is also a result of a specific industry (the best example I can come with is airline program).

What is my conclusion? I think, the slow lifecycle of PLM systems is a problem. It prevents companies from innovation, adopting new business practices. PLM vendors need to focus on how make PLM implementation agile and lean initially with the ability to update with more features, and modifications. Today, there are too many companies that using old technologies and products because they cannot afford a future step in PLM systems development. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 March, 2016

Communication is one of the most challenging aspects of our work. My favorite quote and mantra about communication – you...

8 December, 2010

I read CIMData article Windchill Evolving Lineage. Navigate your browser on the following link. I found this read interesting. CIMData...

10 February, 2012

I’m coming to SolidWorks World 2012 this weekend. SWW is always a special event for me. This year, SolidWorks World...

17 July, 2011

What is the most popular PDM/PLM system in the world? My bet it is probably MS Excel. The flexibility and...

4 November, 2019

PLM needs a paradigm shift. For the last two decades of PLM development, customers and vendors gathered tons of experience...

18 February, 2016

PLM is complex – the paradigm, definition, implementation, technology. Simplification of PLM is the discussion topic among PLM industry people...

6 January, 2016

Who owns product data? Engineering.com article Moving Towards Product Innovation Platforms by Verdi Ogewell brings that question and share some interesting...

4 June, 2018

In my article last week – How to avoid “focus on business” cliche in PLM sales , I introduced typical PLM...

29 December, 2014

Mobile is one of the strongest trends in technology and business these days. I keep following technology and business events...

Blogroll

To the top