A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

New manufacturing business models will influence PLM software

New manufacturing business models will influence PLM software
Oleg
Oleg
19 March, 2015 | 3 min for reading

new-biz-models-plm

Things are moving fast these days. Vendors are speeding up their plans to catch up with new development. The changes are coming from both technological and business sides. Today, I want to focus more on the side of business. Few years ago, I put some of my thoughts in the blog post – Faltered licenses and future business models. Fast forward from 2010 into 2015… there are lot changes in the way software companies are selling their software. Actually, many of them are not selling software anymore. Subscriptions became a reality.

The following article caught my attention earlier this week – Keurig accidentally created the perfect business model for hardware startups by Bolt (venture capital firm focusing on hardware). Take a read – there are some great examples and comparisons of business models in the article. Here are few of my favorite passages:

Recurring revenue matters because it fundamentally changes your business. There are good reasons investors are averse to hardware but love software. One of the leading reasons revolves around future revenue. Investors pay huge premiums to own stock in companies betting on the likelihood that future revenue will be drastically larger than current revenue. If you’re in a traditional hardware business, future revenue is confined to cyclic product sales. This roughly means you get one shot at revenue with each customer per product development cycle: each sale must be painfully acquired by building a new product every 18 months or so.

This is where the brilliance of the Keurig model shines. The initial sale of a $120 Keurig brewer isn’t that difficult or costly. Keurig doesn’t spend a lot on marketing or advertising and the product isn’t complex to manufacture or service. In my rough estimation, the BOM for a brewer is around $40, giving Keurig about a 25% gross margin on the product. Time from PO to FOB is likely less than 2 months, yet high-margin K-cup sales start immediately and continue for years. Keurig spends less than $0.015 on each K-cup and charges 100% more per unit than bagged, ground coffee. Yet few people complain about this cost.

tradition-hardware-vs-saas

The big thing is recurrent revenues. It is much easy to sell something to your customers. Especially, if the price is a comfortable zone. This trend is going up these days.

It made me think more about business models of engineering and manufacturing software. PLM is included. And PLM was guilty many years for very “uncomfortable” price points. Which in many situations lead to wrong set of expectations and failure of PLM adoption.

I can see a trend among software vendors today to change that. It might be a good question how to bring PLM price point to “comfortable zone” and connect it to the use and adoption of software. The more you use it-  the more revenues you will be able to get from customer. On the other side, usage of software means value for customer. Some sort of win-win situations.

What is my conclusion? Business models revolution is coming to enterprise software. In the next few years, we are going to see many examples of innovation in engineering and manufacturing software business models. Freemium and subscription is only beginning. The latest example of Onshape, which is inventing pay for privacy model. Watch that space for innovation. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Picture credit Keurig and Bolt article 

Image courtesy of ddpavumba at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 November, 2010

I just learned that SharePoint migration projects require user’s involvement to be really successful. Navigate your browser to the following...

18 October, 2017

Yesterday, I attended PLM Roadmap, one day event organized by CIMdata and Eurostep. The event is co-located with PDTEurope 2017,...

22 February, 2012

I’m just few hours before two-day marathon of PLM Innovation 2012 in Munich. The list of speakers and the agenda...

12 January, 2011

There is one topic that always raises lots of controversy, in my view. I’m talking about integrations or even more...

28 March, 2011

Last week Autodesk made a series of significant announcements related to their 2012 product lines. Autodesk is shifting to suites....

11 April, 2013

For many years, enterprise software was known as a place where development of new features was one of the main...

23 July, 2020

PLM Sales is one of the topics, I have a special passion for blogging about. Some of my previous articles...

3 June, 2009

I was reading Josh Mings early this week, “Usable 3D Geometry Please” and thought about many announcements that were made...

21 February, 2019

Few years ago, I wrote about how data can be become a driver to improve user experience in PLM systems....

Blogroll

To the top