A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Selection Politics

PLM Selection Politics
Oleg
Oleg
17 February, 2017 | 3 min for reading

plm-selection-politics

Nobody ever got fired for buying from IBM. That was the story of enterprise PLM software for many years. PLM selection process is typically long and require some level of alignment between software vendor and company itself. Last few years of growth in manufacturing and fast growing number of alternative SaaS software, made people in IT departments to watch more carefully their decision making. ROI is still a big deal for PLM implementations. The selection of traditional PLM system will be a decision that influence what manufacturing company will do for the next 5-10 years. So, the selection is not simple.

TEC blog What We Need to Talk about When We Talk about Software Selection gives you a perspective on 5 Problem Areas – Objectivity, Politics, Partnerships, Expectations, Limitations.

Here is my favorite passage about Politics:

We need to recognize when people are playing each other.  Politics manifests itself in social interactions; individuals attempt to influence other people (more or less consciously) in order to obtain a personal benefit. The psychiatrist Eric Berne described these “mind games” in his book Games People Play. His theory is that people adopt three ego states during social interactions—adult, parent, or child—and negative behaviors are caused by the fact that we unconsciously choose to act as children or parents, and not as adults. An example would be an executive who acts as a parent by taking decisions without involving others, which may trigger a childish reaction from the employees such as emotional outbursts or blind obedience. But we should all try to be grown-ups when undertaking a serious business like enterprise software selection.

It made me think about specific reasons why PLM selection might be politically sensitive for the organization. Here is my 3 reasons:

1. PLM is controlling an important information about product and processes in organization. It has a potential to influence how people work in an entire organization by setting rules, policies and process to access data. The last has an impact on how engineering and other organization will perform.

2. Traditional PLM is a very expensive system and it means that PLM organization is responsible for a significant chunk of IT budget. This budget allows to brings contractors, service organizations and consultants. Big budget is good for organizational influence and gives a feeling of importance.

3. PLM is very sticky and once implemented successfully will stay in organization for a very long time. A successful PLM selection can give a sense of job security to people involved into selection and implementation process. It is also a reflection of right strategic decisions taken by PLM key decision makers.

Manufacturing companies are looking for SaaS software to change enterprise software status quo. Cloud services are more agile and can reduce IT burden for an organization. Easy access to software and agile  methods can simplify the process of PLM selection by introducing iterative implementation process.

What is my conclusion? As much as PLM selection process is strategic, I believe new PLM cloud technologies can bring a change. Agile PLM development is possible starting point in the process. The main point is to switch from PLM as a decision for 10 years to PLM as s service today. Existing PLM architecture demand significant preparation work to be done upfront – data modeling, process discovery and agreement, data mapping, legacy data cleaning and importing, etc. The new paradigm of agile continues implementation can become a better way to organize PLM planning as well as PLM selection process. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 May, 2014

Once “social” was a hot topic for PLM developer and analysts. In my view, the hype went down. Ask PLM...

30 July, 2019

One of the biggest competition is competition with the status quo. Exactly one year ago, I wrote about legacy PLM....

27 October, 2017

Single version of truth is a mantra sold by most of enterprise software vendors. PLM is included. I think, PLM...

7 September, 2024

What is the next big topic in PLM technology, PLM systems, product data management and product development process modeling? Speaking...

26 August, 2013

Bill of Materials is a huge topic. It is hard to underestimate the importance of BOM management in general as...

26 November, 2021

Connected PLM transformation is one of the strong trends I can see happening in the market of Product Lifecycle Management...

24 November, 2014

The days of ugly UI are in the past. The trend that started from website design, mobile UI and intuitive...

12 August, 2020

A little bit more than one month ago, two giant companies, Siemens and SAP announced their partnership to deliver integrated...

31 May, 2010

I had chance to analyze what will be the role of Augment reality before on my PLM think tank. I’d...

Blogroll

To the top