A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM ABC (Always Be Competitive)

PLM ABC (Always Be Competitive)
Oleg
Oleg
1 June, 2018 | 4 min for reading

Each product has its lifecycle going from phases of introduction, growth, maturity and decline. It applies to both sides of the table in PLM – manufacturing companies and PLM vendors. Today, I wan to talk more about PLM vendors.

SharePLM blog article ABC of Product Management by Sami Grönstrand made me think about competitiveness of PLM solutions and B2B market PLM software vendors are doing their businesses. The article nicely focus on two very important issues – competitiveness and value. Both are connected and changing within the time.

Competitiveness is about providing superior value to customers, winning deals over competition, AND sustaining higher profitability. It’s easy to win deals by dropping product prices, but without doing the same for the product cost, it will lead your company to perish. Establishing and sustaining competitive advantage requires much more — you can dive into the concept for example in the 1985 book by Michael E. Porter.

Diving one level deeper into competitiveness and profitability, we reach Customer Value, Price and Cost. Those three things are by far the most important things to decide about your product. What Customer Job you intend to solve, at what price do you plan to sell it and at which cost must you produce it.

No matter what your business is, your product must have a compelling value proposition  spelled out in monetary terms. Especially in B-to-B markets, there are more than one person making the decision, hence the value proposition should be adapted for each decision maker so that it resonates with their interest profile. Crafting a Value Proposition is fine art, and something that the Product Manager must do in collaboration – with Sales, Marketing, Engineering, Manufacturing, Customer Services and so on.

But this is my favorite passage:

Today, the customer has an amazing amount of information available, and it is also important to provide it. Recent research suggests that customers are over halfway through the decision making before contacting the first time the company about the product!. This makes Sales and also Product Management more challenging than ever, and at the same time, more exciting than ever!

In my view, companies are much more over halfway through the decision making when they contacting PLM vendors.

For the last decade of PLM development, I can see how these two aspects (competitiveness and value) were converging into something less exciting. While adoption of PLM solution was growing, differentiation factors between PLM solutions were removed. Features & functions of a typical PLM system today are more or less the same.

The importance of value and competitiveness are emerging. Which one of PLM solution to choose? Most of differentiators between Teamcenter, Windchill and Enovia are related to CAD products. While PDM functions are almost standard, going beyond PDM is a complex decision for most of companies usually requires a substantial amount of different consulting and implementation services.

For smaller manufacturing companies, the value of PLM solution is always at question and comes together with a very high cost and complexity.

What is the solution? Going to back to value definitions and competitiveness. As much as it sounds simple, it is one of the most complex product definition exercises I can think about for PLM product managers theses days. Thinking out of the box, not to hide behind old PLM stigmas as single point of truth, competition with status quo and urgency of making a decision. This is very small, but important set of questions.

What is my conclusion? I think, PLM industry should come back to whiteboards to think about value and competitiveness. PLM vendors are stuck in status quo. Even the companies that are innovative in this domain are not providing enough reasons for customers to adopt new solutions. The fear of failure is significant and combined with a nice status quo nirvana creates a complex product data management landscape. Note for PLM product data management – you have a bigger problem to focus on rather then just saying product A is better than product B. Finding the answer comparing two PLM products is hard. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 January, 2011

Last week, during PLM Innovation Congress in London, I talked about future trends in PLM and engineering software. If you...

14 March, 2017

To implement PLM isn’t an easy project. Especially when it comes to large PLM implementations going beyond document management control...

9 December, 2010

I found the following WSJ Pool interesting. Will you use your Facebook’s email service as you primary email? You can...

7 March, 2011

A couple of weeks ago, I posted PLM Platform Wars: Who is Right or Who is Left? The following short...

7 December, 2017

Earlier today my attention was caught by Forrester PLM research for discrete manufacturing industry. Almost simultaneously, two PLM vendors –...

23 December, 2010

Short note this morning. I just learned about Etacts, company that launched their solution earlier this year. Etacts wizards understood...

22 December, 2015

Information and process silos. For manufacturing organizations silos is a problem that slows down innovation and enterprise software efficiency regardless on...

22 May, 2015

To access product information is one of the most important roles of PLM system. Time ago, organizing data in folders...

29 June, 2010

My post Open vs. Closed PLM Debates last week and related Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt –...

Blogroll

To the top