A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM – Moving From Data Access to Human Behavior 

PLM – Moving From Data Access to Human Behavior 
Oleg
Oleg
6 June, 2025 | 5 min for reading

I’m still digesting my Share PLM Summit experience. If you missed my previous articles, check them here – What I Learned at the Share PLM Summit: Five Observations That Challenge the Status Quo. The webinar to discuss Share PLM Summit experience is coming later in June (here is the invitation)- The Future of PLM – Episode 3: SharePLM Summit 25 – Recap and Way Forward

In one of the comment about my Share PLM Summit presentation Five Principles of Building Human Centric PLM, I’ve got a comment asking about use-focused systems. It sounded like this – are user-oriented systems and human centric is the same? My initial reaction was to say – year, it is about people using the systems, but after some thoughts, I came to the conclusion that there is a bit more to unpack in this question/ In my blog today, I’m going to share my thoughts with you. 

In enterprise software, we often hear the word “user.” We design for users, build user interfaces, and create user workflows.

But here’s something I’ve been thinking about lately, maybe that’s not enough.

When we say user, we usually mean someone performing a role in the system. An engineer. A buyer. A planner. A person doing a function.

But when we say human, we’re talking about the whole person, not just what they do, but how they do it. Their behavior, their habits, their questions, their frustrations.

That’s the real difference:
User = function
Human = behavior 

From Tasks to Behavior 

Traditional enterprise software — especially PLM — has always been focused on tasks.

You define roles, assign permissions, and map out workflows. The system says, “You’re a buyer, here’s your screen. You’re an engineer, here’s your data table and task list.”

That’s helpful to a point. It gets things done. But humans don’t live in tidy workflows. We jump between roles. We forget things. We ask questions. We need context. And most systems aren’t great at helping with that.

Conversations, Not Clicks

Here’s a simple example.

Imagine a buyer looking at a change order. In a typical system, they might need to click through four screens to get all the information: the part, the supplier, the price change, the approval history.

But what if they could just ask:
“Why did the cost of this part go up?”
Or
“Who approved this change?”

That’s what a human-centric system does. It doesn’t just give you reports and dashboards — it talks back in a way that makes sense. It answers questions the way a colleague would.

It’s not about making things fancy. It’s about making them natural.

The Data Behind It: A Manufacturing Graph

Of course, for a system to understand questions like that, it needs the right data foundation.

Most legacy PLM and ERP systems are built SQL databases 25 years old architectures. They’re good at storing data, but not at connecting the dots.

That’s why we need a graphs for PLM. This is a way to represent how things are related. Not just CAD files, parts and BOMs, but who changed them, when, why, and what else was affected.

This kind of data model connects people, not just objects. It reflects how humans actually think — in conversations and connections, not lists.

Designing for People, Not Just Roles

Here’s another way to look at it.

User-centric design asks:
“Show my my Bill of Materials with attached files?”

Human-centric design asks:
“What does this person need to understand?”
“Find all files that still needs to be reviewed”

One is about completing tasks. The other is about building confidence, reducing confusion, and helping someone move forward. In the end, it’s not just about features. It’s about fit — how well the system fits the person using it.

In one of my favorite books – Don’t Make Me Think by Steve Krug, I learned that an experience must be easy and simple to understand without forcing people to apply some additional logic to understand how it works.

Why It Matters in PLM Software?

PLM software are full of valuable data such as parts, CAD drawings, items, revisions, changes. But too often, the systems are hard to use and even harder to adopt.

That’s because they’re built for users, not humans.

If we want people to actually use PLM software and not just tolerate them, then we need to make the system behavior more helpful, more flexible, and more human.

That means:

  • Conversational interfaces instead of complex menus
  • Graph-based data that connects the dots
  • AI agents that guide, answer, and learn
  • Workflows that adapt to real-life behavior

What is My Conclusion? 

At the end of the day, people don’t adopt software because it has more features. They adopt it because it helps them do their job, to solve problems, understand their world, and feel in control.

That’s what human-centric design is about.

It’s not superior. It’s just better aligned with how people work.

And maybe that’s what enterprise software, especially PLM software, needs more of.

Just my thoughts… 

Best, Oleg 

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native collaborative and integration services between engineering tools including PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 February, 2016

One of my passions is to share information and comments related to product lifecycle management (PLM), engineering and manufacturing software....

7 January, 2013

What do you think about “social PLM” trend? I don’t see many cheerleaders of social PLM nowadays. The excitement and...

21 March, 2011

One of my blog readers shared with me slides of Paul Saunders presentation about MRO software from the Miami Aircraft...

22 May, 2015

Products are getting complex these days. Look on every small electronic gadget in your hands. It is actually combined from...

10 April, 2021

Earlier this week, one of my readers asked me a question about the lifecycle of IT systems and PLM systems...

1 October, 2014

Designers and engineers working in manufacturing, architecture and construction firms are familiar with the idea of Z-drive. Usually, this is...

16 November, 2016

I attended Autodesk University 2016 opening keynote yesterday. 10’000 people crowd, crazy loud music and future vision of engineering software....

22 February, 2017

Digitalization is the integration of digital technologies into engineering and manufacturing process by switching from traditional process into a new...

17 January, 2012

Simplification is a significant trend. I’ve been watching it a lot in consumer space. People got really obsessed by simplification...

Blogroll

To the top