Vendors
How different is Onshape PDM?
Engineering.com article A Solidworks user look at Onshape brought my PDM twisted mind again to what I call CAD version of Turgenev’s novel “Faters an Sons. Modern CAD Onshape is competing with once modern CAD Solidworks created almost by the same group of people, but 20 years later. Read the article and…
Graph Navigation and PLM user experience paradigms
PTC Named the Technology Leader, but what can we learn from the ranking?
Last year, I wrote about Why traditional PLM ranking is dead. The article raised a wave of discussion and debates about how to compare PLM solutions – a comprehensive set of tools and technologies coming from giant software vendors. One year later, my attention was caught by another ranking article…
PLM stretch towards ERP?
It is not a secret that PLM has strong roots in engineering. PLM was born as an extension of CAD and engineering business. Expanding from CAD, PDM and engineering was a very logical approach, but it created high level dependencies between PLM and engineering disciplines. Some of you might disagree,…
Hosted PLM and the problem of cloud integration
The Art of PLM Differentiation Marketing
PLM differentiation is hard. In past, I shared my thoughts about how to differentiate PLM products, technologies and vendors. You can see some examples how PLM companies are differentiating themselves through technology, packaging, business models, brand and other factors. However, things are getting hard. Everyone has a platform these days and…
What PLM architects can learn from CES 2019 report?
Can we liberate product data from PLM vendors and dissolve it with digital thread?
Future of PLM beyond complex answers from nostalgic PDM experts
PLM was started few decades ago and it looks like coming to some sort of mid-life crisis. I can see it by an increased number of questions about PLM challenges, accumulated problems, regrets about past projects and challenges in existing implementation. There is growing number of questions about ability of…