A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What is beyond Collaboration and Process Management in PLM?

What is beyond Collaboration and Process Management in PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 January, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Collaboration and Process Management is obviously a very important part of Product Lifecycle Management. But does it really target successful Product Lifecycle Management implementation?  Yes, I think that allowing people to collaborate and have this process organized and synchronized with all other processes in your organization is the ultimate goal of any PLM implementation. Assuming you have already done this… does it make you feel good about your implementation? More importantly, does it make you feel good about your company?  If you answered NO, (as I suspect), I’d like to discuss and raise questions to discover what is beyond Collaboration and Process Management.

 I think that decision making needs to be taken care of by Product Lifecycle Management very urgently. I’m not talking about the ability of the system to make decisions, rather the ability of the PLM system to take control over product data that will help people in decision making. In order to make this happen, PLM tools need to provide a decision-oriented environment, that will allow the user (engineer, analyst, manager) to make the appropriate decision about change, design, priority etc.

 In order to make this happen, PLM needs to step up from a process-oriented environment to a multi-domain, content oriented environment. PLM needs to manage multiple domains of data, allowing the users of  (PLM) systems to access Requirements, Engineering, Parts, Customers, Manufacturing, etc. By allowing this, PLM will give users the chance to control the most important decisions in the organization. I see this as the ultimate value of PLM, beyond collaboration between people and the management of processes. 

If you are planning on implementing PLM today, what should you put on your short list to achieve these goals? In my view, you need to invest in two areas – operational business intelligence and the integration of your PLM system with other enterprise systems. The first area will give you tools to present information to make the right decision. The second will integrate product data into connected multi-domain data sets (such as multiple Bill of Materials etc.). Achievements of these two goals will allow PLM systems to move beyond day-to-day collaboration and process activities.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 August, 2018

You probably heard it many times for the last few years – cloud PLM is not for everyone. And when...

7 January, 2014

Social topic might have another interesting turn. During few days off I had last week, I was reviewing unread social...

22 January, 2013

One of the biggest tech events for me last week was Facebook Graph Search. If you haven’t heard about this,...

13 November, 2017

I’m at Autodesk University (AU) 2017 this week getting ready to a marathon of keynote presentations, sessions, discussions, meetings. To...

11 May, 2018

For the past few decades, PLM passed many stages of development. It was started as a form of configuration management,...

1 April, 2012

Note, this is NOT 1st April post :). Multi-CAD and PLM. Endless story… Few weeks ago, I published my post The...

11 February, 2015

Free is an interesting trend. As we always said, there is no free lunch. But, last decade introduced us to...

17 June, 2010

I had chance to read Buzz message thread about ECO management, initiated by Josh Mings. I found it worth reading....

24 June, 2010

I read Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt – Chrysler’s Engineering Software Shift. In the competitive world of...

Blogroll

To the top