A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

3 main factors of mainstream PLM adoption

3 main factors of mainstream PLM adoption
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 July, 2009 | 3 min for reading

plm-mainstreamI had chance to discuss PLM adoption rate already several time. I think, adoption rate, is one of the factors why Product Lifecycle Management is not coming to mainstream and remains something exclusive. If I look back in the computer and CAD industry history, the revolutions happened when sophisticated technologies were moved from exclusive and more expensive environment to mainstream. Microsoft did it for PC, John Walker and his partners moved from exclusive CAD workstations to mainstream PC in 1982, SolidWorks took all experience Pro-E developed until 1995 and revolutionized it on Windows platform.

So, what I had in my mind over this weekend is to think more about how to find roots for expensive and complicated PLM implementations. What those factors that make them so complicated and maybe to put few initial thoughts about how to move them to mainstream. I thought about every PLM implementation I had chance to touch and came to a conclusion that the following three major factors or steps are always causing complexity and cost: 1/Customization; 2/Legacy data; 3/Integration with ERP and other systems.

#1 – Customization.
This is a very significant piece of every PLM implementation. I hardly believe in “typical manufacturing environment”. Yes, definitely, there is some general similarity based on industry or organization type, but fundamentally people are running manufacturing differently, have their own environment, semantics of data, customized name schemas etc. So, cost to customize PLM system to get it to the right level is quite significant. To have right customization tools and integrated programming environment is key to success here. Everything is possible in software – we know that. However, what will be cost of these “possibilities”?

#2 – Legacy Data
In order to run your manufacturing environment, you need to have “your data” in the system. Without this, you are not actually running your manufacturing with PLM. To get legacy data in the system is a very painful task, in my view. I have almost never seen this happened easy. This is almost every time set of complicated steps of exporting and importing data. Since, there is no standard data, we back partially to factor #1 (customization) again.

#2 – Integration with ERP
This is last, but not least. The first chain in product development PLM needs to support is integration with ERP. If you don’t have integration with ERP implemented, you have closed environment that almost cannot optimize your manufacturing. Most of the product cost driving factors these days are on the intersection of product requirements, design and manufacturing and supply chain capabilities. To make integration with ERP is #1 task for PLM.

So, what is my short conclusion? These three factors can move every PLM implementation to nightmare. In today’s modern PLM systems, I had chance to follow few possible solutions to resolve these issues. Most PLM providers these days are focusing on industries, verticals and best practices. Not bad step in my view. As much closer you will come to final environment, less time you will spend to customize final environment. From integration and customization standpoint, moving to Microsoft development environment, Visual Basic and script based customization can be very efficient to decrease cost of implementation.
Even if I don’t think, these solutions are completely successful, but they definitely can bring some pain relief. However, I do believe, the right solutions are probably still in the future.

I’m looking forward to your comment and thoughts. I’d be glad to learn about your experience.
Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 May, 2009

Last month, I wrote a few posts about Bill of Materials. My interest was to investigate how to improve Bill...

11 December, 2008

Organizational expectation from PLM implementation is to organize entire lifecycle process of product in organization. With this expectation PLM positioned...

17 August, 2012

Think about the most overused term in PDM/PLM software for the last decade (or even more). Collaboration. It was developed...

28 May, 2013

Do you like acronyms and buzzwords? Not much, I guess. You probably familiar with that one – BYOD (Bring Your...

13 June, 2016

Cloud is coming to CAD and design world. Slowly, but surely CAD vendors are getting more interested in how to...

4 April, 2016

Terminology is important. You don’t want customers to get confused with the wrong term or technological buzzword. Unfortunately, some of...

16 August, 2010

Bloomberg Business Week published an interesting story – Big Tech Problem as Mainframes Outlast Workforce. Some facts about IBM mainframe...

26 May, 2010

The following request in LinkedIn On Demand Discussion Group – Can Someone Provide The List of PLM OnDemand/SaaS vendors? So I...

30 April, 2023

This weekend I want to come back to basics. You can ask why to do so. With such a high...

Blogroll

To the top