A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 April, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I hope you know about my “love and hate” relationships with Excel. I posted many times about how deep Excel integrated into current CAD/PDM/PLM software life. Think about that, for the moment. You are getting Bill of Materials and Design Tables in CAD using Excel, lots of reports, catalogs and other data. There are lots of other reasons too. Just as an example you can take a look on one of my old “Excel” posts – Why Do I like My PLM Excel Spreadsheets?

About few months ago, I found an interesting Microsoft Live Lab product called “Pivot“. I posted about that. You can see my original post via this link. My initial thoughts were about how to try this pivot functionality on the real PLM data to see what is possible to achieve. Fortunately, this blog post got into attention of Simon Floyd from Microsoft, and he made this experiment. Last week at COFES 2010 during Maieutic Parataxis session, Simon presented his experiments. Full presentation from Maieutic Parataxis session will be available later this link. However, you can see some of the slides below.

I think, Pivot concept is an interesting experiment. Excel paradigm is very popular. At the same time, customer demands towards simple and clean user interfaces in PDM/PLM systems are very strong. Pivot can put lights on some potential in more deep exploration of Excel capabilities. Some of the visual representations in Pivot are similar to existing PLM products. Filtering and pivoting functionality is strong and interesting. To get information into Pivot can be challenging in my view.

What is my conclusion? PLM Pivot experiment requires attentions. Usability in PLM systems is a hard problem.Despite all claims mainstream customers are dissatisfied.  I’m very interesting to hear what do you think about this example? As usual, I’m looking forward to your comments.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 July, 2010

I read the following article by Manufacturing Automation – SAP Taps Partnership for Manufacturing Software Enhancement. (you need to be a member...

15 September, 2014

The aim of PLM is to improve product development processes and lifecycle. One of the biggest challenges to make it...

7 September, 2009

Reading Vuuch post “Do Opposite Attract in Business Process?”, I decided to go future and think about opposites in PLM....

30 June, 2009

This post caught my attention last week. “PLM, please take 3 giant steps forward!” by Jim Brown. I’m very well...

30 April, 2023

This weekend I want to come back to basics. You can ask why to do so. With such a high...

29 February, 2016

Entrepreneurs are taking manufacturing by storm. Recent HBR article –Entrepreneurs Take On Manufacturing by Mark Muro gives you an interesting perspective on...

10 September, 2021

While cloud and the internet are a way to live and breathe for many of us, the adoption of SaaS...

3 September, 2010

Manufacturers are going global these days. Nobody is surprised to have design, manufacturing and support are going across the globe....

16 January, 2015

Computers are changing the way we work. It is probably too broad statement. But if I think about the fact...

Blogroll

To the top