What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg



Share This Post

  • hi oleg,
    just have time for a short message. I think that there is a lot to expect from google on that topic. Maybe it will start from GIS as they have already a very popular introduction tool with google maps/earth. Will they someday go in ERP, PLM, CAD? i’d like to see that. I’ve heard that the Android recently did better than the Iphone in the US (ok the fact that it is on many platforms makes it easier).
    Best Regards,
    Yoann Maingon

  • Yoann, I don’t believe Google wil go in short term to the spaces you mentioned. This is too narrow market for them in comparison to Google mobile, TV and rich media. In my view, Google in enterprise is focusing on Office app and GSA for the moment. I agree, they are doing stuff in GIS, but their interest in this space, probably ignited by other spaces like GPS, mobile, etc. Just my thoughts… Best, Oleg

  • Anthony deSilva

    I would like to know your view on compliance with the ASME Y14 standard. How flexible is compliance or is it a rigid document? Does anyone adhere to it 100% and is this possible? I work at a 75 year old company in the midst of reevaluating our drawing standards and would like you comments.

  • Anthony, Unfortunately, I’m not very familiar much with the standard you mentioned. Is it something about drafting? Thank you, Oleg

  • Pingback: Open Standards and Data Sharing()

  • Pingback: Open Standards and Data Sharing « Daily PLM Think Tank Blog()