A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 February, 2013

Dogfooding or “eating your dog food” is a fascinating topic. It came to us from computer software company. This slang...

21 July, 2010

The ability to have an important engineering information reference seems to me obvious. Thanks for one of my readers, who...

17 June, 2023

It is 2023 and every manufacturing company in the world understands that digital transformation is the name of the game....

10 January, 2012

There is a lot going on in database space these days. Few days ago I posted – PLM, RDBMS and...

17 September, 2015

One size doesn’t fit all. This is very true for engineering and manufacturing. Product lifecycle is a term that I...

29 December, 2010

I read GigaOM – The network computer arrives… finally! About three weeks ago, Google launched the Chrome application store and demonstrated...

19 June, 2018

I’m attending PTC LiveWorx industry event in Boston. This year it called “Digital Transformation Conference”. Well… I’m not surprised. Digital transformation...

3 December, 2013

I’m attending Autodesk University (AU 2013) these days in  busy Las Vegas, NV. If you had a chance to attend...

17 July, 2009

Short note. Google released the package that allows to move from IBM Lotus Notes to Google Apps. Take a look...

Blogroll

To the top