A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?

What Is The Future Of CAD and PLM Standards?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had chance to read the following publication on Develop3D – A New Common Data Standard. The author is discussing how life of CAD can be impacted and potentially improved by developing of a single CAD standard. In addition, I figure out that I used word “standard” many times commenting on last posts on my blog. It made me think about standards again. Standards are rising so many questions. It always sounds as beneficial. However, standard related activities create too many political and organizational issues. I decided to make a try and figure out if standards are our future in PLM.

Standards and Users
Companies and Individuals can belong to a group that potential may have huge benefits from standards. Your systems expected to work more smoothly, you can move between applications, you can benefits data sharing, etc .. However, at the same time, standards can stand on the way of innovation. Some of them may really prevent people from innovation.

Standards and Industries
I know many examples of industry oriented standards. In general, industry standards may indicate an industry health. The more standards industry develops- the more additional businesses and solutions can be created on top of that. In general, standards can bring industry on the next level.  In most cases, standards that emerged from industries are very stable.

Standards and Vendors
Do you think vendors need standards? The right answer – it depends, in my view… If it brings economical benefits, it can be really beneficial for a specific vendor. However, it is not clear and in most of the case to support a standard vendor need to put an additional effort. So it means additional expenses. In some cases (i.e. Supply chain), vendors can be interested in standards in order of work simplification between users in a supply chain.

What is my conclusion today? Standards are fascinating. However, standard activity is a very expensive. An additional work need to be done by vendors to support standards. So, behind standards, we can see a very simple economical use case. On the other side, users can have benefits from standards. Maybe we need to think about different business models, that less impacted by lock-in customers on their data? Thinking about pros and cons, I’d like to re-phrase my question as following now- Who Will Pay for future CAD/ PLM standards?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 November, 2012

Product cost. Talk to any manufacturing company in the world and they will tell you that cost is one of...

12 October, 2015

We love to speak about latest gadget features and disruptive technologies. Earlier this month, CNet posted  about “telepresence robot” is...

27 August, 2012

I screw up my promise to stop blogging during my vacation. I’m in Israel these days with my family. You...

31 October, 2021

We live in a very interesting time. The manufacturing environment is changing rapidly. It is driven by multiple factors such...

14 July, 2010

I think, the future of engineering software belongs to solutions that will provide a higher level of granularity. More flexible...

27 January, 2017

  ALM and PLM integration and common trajectories is very interesting trend to follow. Back in 2015 I’ve made a...

19 April, 2010

I can see multiple debates these days related to the social software – Social Networking, Microblogging and others. Despite the absolute...

26 October, 2010

Later this week I’m going to attend PTC Lightening Event in Boston. For the last few months, I followed how PTC was...

1 August, 2021

Every manufacturing company is sitting on the goldmine these days. I’m talking about the data that is owned by a...

Blogroll

To the top