PLM Implementations and KISSASSing

by Oleg on May 26, 2011 · View Comments

Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation. According to CIMData, about 60% of cPDM revenues is coming from services. This is a huge number. Simplicity is another big issue related to PLM implementations. Keep it simple. Another important one is about to have C-level sponsor in an organization for your PLM project. To keep it simple and having C-level sponsor in your organization are, in my view, two most important elements of a successful PLM strategy.

The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation. It consumes a lot of energy, preparation, meeting and consulting work. The following blog post made me laugh – A new methodology for planning SharePoint Projects – how to win a tender. I learned a new buzzword or TLA (Three letter acronym): KISSASSing.

This is my favorite passage:

The problem I found with KISS is that when you pitch your design to other types of audience, for example, upper management, it tends not to be accepted. Initially, I thought it may be that management are less prone to like being called “stupid” (which is why I always phrased it “Keep it simple, silly!” – but that never improved things much), but the more I thought about it, I realized that those audiences just expect more out of a solution design than just simplicity. In other words – KISSing the upper management is not enough. This is why I decided to come up with my own new principle that extends KISS and adds the things that upper management really wants from a solution architect: Keep It Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable and Secure.

What is my conclusion? Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable, Secure.  This is actually, a very good slogan for PLM marketing campaign. Not sure marketing will take it. Have some smile :) … Live is short.

Best, Oleg

Disclosure: I’m acknowledging, this is my late Aprl-1 fool post.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Paul Saunders

    I'm not sure how appropriate it is to share some of the Anglo Saxon acronyms we have over here with British software. We have users who are Trained With Advanced Technology and who are Completely Useless.....[censored]
    Good post Oleg... thanks for sharing

  • beyondplm

    Paul, thanks for comments! Best, Oleg

  • jbrown

    Sounds better than my Flexible Uninterrupted Collaborative Knowledgebase of Enterprise Resources

  • beyondplm

    Oh... yeah!. Tnx for one more TLA :)...

  • VERY funny Kissassing - we need more humor in PLM - keep up the good work- Steve

  • beyondplm

    Steve, thanks!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: