A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation. According to CIMData, about 60% of cPDM revenues is coming from services. This is a huge number. Simplicity is another big issue related to PLM implementations. Keep it simple. Another important one is about to have C-level sponsor in an organization for your PLM project. To keep it simple and having C-level sponsor in your organization are, in my view, two most important elements of a successful PLM strategy.

The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation. It consumes a lot of energy, preparation, meeting and consulting work. The following blog post made me laugh – A new methodology for planning SharePoint Projects – how to win a tender. I learned a new buzzword or TLA (Three letter acronym): KISSASSing.

This is my favorite passage:

The problem I found with KISS is that when you pitch your design to other types of audience, for example, upper management, it tends not to be accepted. Initially, I thought it may be that management are less prone to like being called “stupid” (which is why I always phrased it “Keep it simple, silly!” – but that never improved things much), but the more I thought about it, I realized that those audiences just expect more out of a solution design than just simplicity. In other words – KISSing the upper management is not enough. This is why I decided to come up with my own new principle that extends KISS and adds the things that upper management really wants from a solution architect: Keep It Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable and Secure.

What is my conclusion? Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable, Secure.  This is actually, a very good slogan for PLM marketing campaign. Not sure marketing will take it. Have some smile :)… Live is short.

Best, Oleg

Disclosure: I’m acknowledging, this is my late Aprl-1 fool post.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 January, 2010

Almost a year ago, I raised the question asking if free is going to be the future of PLM? You...

8 December, 2009

Some thoughts about how Microsoft’s futuristic commercials can be connected to Google’ reality. Yesterday announcement of Visual Search or how...

3 January, 2014

Our hardware life is much more diversified these days. Smartphones and tablets made a dent in the universe of Windows...

26 May, 2024

PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) has been around for a long time. It was initially developed as a a set of...

25 September, 2010

I’m coming late this month with my top 5 post. It was mostly caused by me attending two conferences as...

22 March, 2018

I was invited to speak at Develop3D Live 2018 about Data Management. If you followed my blog earlier, you might...

24 June, 2015

For many years, design collaboration and change management was an ultimate requirement for PDM tools. To manage revision history, share...

15 November, 2016

I’m at AU2016 this week. Yesterday, I had a chance to attend Autodesk Forge Dev Day. It is a  gathering...

14 October, 2011

I wanted to share some of my notes from yesterday Dassault PLM forum in Moscow. Getting back to previous forums...

Blogroll

To the top