A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation. According to CIMData, about 60% of cPDM revenues is coming from services. This is a huge number. Simplicity is another big issue related to PLM implementations. Keep it simple. Another important one is about to have C-level sponsor in an organization for your PLM project. To keep it simple and having C-level sponsor in your organization are, in my view, two most important elements of a successful PLM strategy.

The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation. It consumes a lot of energy, preparation, meeting and consulting work. The following blog post made me laugh – A new methodology for planning SharePoint Projects – how to win a tender. I learned a new buzzword or TLA (Three letter acronym): KISSASSing.

This is my favorite passage:

The problem I found with KISS is that when you pitch your design to other types of audience, for example, upper management, it tends not to be accepted. Initially, I thought it may be that management are less prone to like being called “stupid” (which is why I always phrased it “Keep it simple, silly!” – but that never improved things much), but the more I thought about it, I realized that those audiences just expect more out of a solution design than just simplicity. In other words – KISSing the upper management is not enough. This is why I decided to come up with my own new principle that extends KISS and adds the things that upper management really wants from a solution architect: Keep It Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable and Secure.

What is my conclusion? Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable, Secure.  This is actually, a very good slogan for PLM marketing campaign. Not sure marketing will take it. Have some smile :)… Live is short.

Best, Oleg

Disclosure: I’m acknowledging, this is my late Aprl-1 fool post.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 April, 2018

I’m coming back from Ann Arbor Michigan where I attended CIMdata North American PLM industry and market forum. You can...

1 August, 2025

BOM is the data foundation of engineering and manufacturing. Even its name can spark some controversy among professionals in these...

18 March, 2012

Multitenancy. You may ask me why I want to spend this Sunday morning talking about multitenancy. Well… two words –...

28 July, 2010

I read Microsoft Talked Open Data, Open Cloud and watched Microsoft’s Jean Paoli video. It seems to me, Microsoft is...

10 January, 2021

In the last few weeks, I published articles to share with you the retrospective of PLM architecture – system, data,...

7 June, 2010

I’m continuing with my top 5 posts on PLM Think Tank. Do you think PLM is a trending word on...

19 August, 2011

Google-Moto deal created a lot of fuss and speculation. At the same time, it created an example of cross-domain innovation,...

2 September, 2011

I’m adding another post to my collection of PLM definitions. Gavlin Quinlan came with the blog post on concurrent-engineering blog...

5 April, 2011

I found an increased trend of conversation around the “post-PC” topic. I found the conversation fascinating. Are we going to...

Blogroll

To the top