A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation. According to CIMData, about 60% of cPDM revenues is coming from services. This is a huge number. Simplicity is another big issue related to PLM implementations. Keep it simple. Another important one is about to have C-level sponsor in an organization for your PLM project. To keep it simple and having C-level sponsor in your organization are, in my view, two most important elements of a successful PLM strategy.

The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation. It consumes a lot of energy, preparation, meeting and consulting work. The following blog post made me laugh – A new methodology for planning SharePoint Projects – how to win a tender. I learned a new buzzword or TLA (Three letter acronym): KISSASSing.

This is my favorite passage:

The problem I found with KISS is that when you pitch your design to other types of audience, for example, upper management, it tends not to be accepted. Initially, I thought it may be that management are less prone to like being called “stupid” (which is why I always phrased it “Keep it simple, silly!” – but that never improved things much), but the more I thought about it, I realized that those audiences just expect more out of a solution design than just simplicity. In other words – KISSing the upper management is not enough. This is why I decided to come up with my own new principle that extends KISS and adds the things that upper management really wants from a solution architect: Keep It Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable and Secure.

What is my conclusion? Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable, Secure.  This is actually, a very good slogan for PLM marketing campaign. Not sure marketing will take it. Have some smile :)… Live is short.

Best, Oleg

Disclosure: I’m acknowledging, this is my late Aprl-1 fool post.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 July, 2010

My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. The original post is here. Social is trending these days. We can see...

31 October, 2021

We live in a very interesting time. The manufacturing environment is changing rapidly. It is driven by multiple factors such...

7 May, 2021

Engineering.com article by Verdi Ogewell – New Leaders in Forrester’s PLM Wave: Why Siemens Will be a Tough Nut to...

19 December, 2014

Have you heard about collaborative economy? If you are not familiar with the term, it is a time to get...

25 August, 2024

In the rapidly evolving landscape of manufacturing, data has emerged as a pivotal asset, often referred to as the “new...

25 November, 2015

All PLM vendors can delivery some sort of cloud solutions today. You can see my recent update to PLM cloud...

2 December, 2020

Teamcenter X: Future Ready Cloud PLM says Siemens’ website invites you to try Teamcenter X for 30 days. If you...

16 December, 2016

One size doesn’t fit all. It is hard to standardize enterprise software. Engineers are always in a disagreement how to...

12 July, 2019

Steve Porter’s article Best in Show- Can ERP Providers do PLM? is a throwback in the mood of thinking about...

Blogroll

To the top