A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Electric Design and PLM Roadmap

Electric Design and PLM Roadmap
Oleg
Oleg
29 June, 2011 | 2 min for reading

In the early beginning, solutions for manufacturing were focusing primarily on machinery and mechanical design. The historical reason here is simple – mechanical design was a key element of manufacturing for many years. However, the era of ‘mechanical design only’ ends. We can hear more and more about various aspects of combined solutions – Siemens PLM was coming with mechatronics already a couple of years ago. Earlier this month, on PlanetPTC, I’ve heard many stories about software related aspects of product design.

I’ve been reading Design New article yesterday – Mentor Takes a Lifecycle Approach to Electrical Design. It talks about latest Mentor announcement related to the expansion of their Capital electric design platform. This is my favorite passage (actually quote by Martin O’Brien):

The new Capital suite delivers on all of its traditional capabilities in addition to new functionality for designing the architecture and aiding service technicians supporting the finished product in the field. It also encompasses enterprise data management and compliance functionality, serving as a single repository to help manage and support the highly specialized materials and workflows associated with seeing a complex electrical system through each phase of its lifecycle.

Does it mean Electric Design is going to PLM route now? This is an interesting question. In my view, PLM approach is very successful when we deal with complex product development issues. Remember aircraft design, product configuration, etc. These are examples where product lifecycle management presented significant improvement and good results. Electrical design was standing separate long time. The same was for electronic and software. Is it going to change now?

The picture is courtesy of Design News blog.

The complexity of products is the real issue we need to discuss and mention in this context. Everything becomes more complex now. Ford T was a simple car. Nowadays, products become really complex. The integration of various elements is key problem manufacturing are facing these days.

What is my conclusion? I can see Mentor is going down to the road and implementing many features and functions we’ve seen in traditional PLM products. Lifecycle, Technical documentation, multiple functional representations. The word “single repository” mentioned by Mr. O’Brien made me worry a bit. In my view, traditional PLMs found themselves in the “single repository” mouse trap by trying to integrate everything in a single database. The cost and complexity of implementations are growing. Is it something vendors like Mentor can avoid? Learn from other mistakes? Is it possible in software word?

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 January, 2014

  As a matter of fact, PLM and BIM domains are quite independent. Nevertheless, I can hear more and more...

5 February, 2016

The time when you product was a piece of machinery is over. These days, every product is a combination of...

9 January, 2021

Aras is one of the companies I’m continuously following for quite a while. Alongside interesting architecture, Aras is also innovative...

18 December, 2021

As technology advances, businesses must be able to upgrade their software and platforms in order to remain competitive. Historically, PLM...

30 August, 2010

I read the following article “Oracle v Google: Why?“. I found it as a very deep analysis of the latest...

13 March, 2019

It is 2019 outside and cloud computing is a reality in business software. During the last 10 years, the trajectory...

3 September, 2010

Manufacturers are going global these days. Nobody is surprised to have design, manufacturing and support are going across the globe....

9 November, 2015

It has been few months since I published my first comparison between PLM cloud services provided by different CAD, PLM...

1 September, 2010

There are few terms in enterprise software and specifically in engineering software that was completely overused. In my view, collaboration...

Blogroll

To the top