A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Multi-CAD & PDM integration: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

Multi-CAD & PDM integration: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow
Oleg
Oleg
7 March, 2012 | 3 min for reading

I’d like to continue my discussion about multi-CAD and PDM started few weeks ago. If you want to catch up on my earlier posts about the same topic, please navigate to the following link to read my previous post – The Anatomy of MultiCAD-PDM integrations. Some other articles you might be interested to read – Autodesk, Vault and Multi-CAD and Multi-CAD and PDM: Dead Lock? The story of Multi-CAD and PDM is not new and complex. It mixes multiple topics – product complexity, customer environment complexity, software vendors business strategy, development complexity and many others. The solution to solve MultiCAD / PDM integration requires software vendor commitment to openness in general and to open APIs specifically. Here is the conclusion I made in my last post:

Let’s face the reality, because of the absolute importance,  companies [ software vendors ] easy can get provoked to use it as a competitive advantage. In addition to “openness” in general, the ultimate way to solve this problem is Open API. I believe Open APIs is the most important strategic factor for companies to be competitive in the future.

Today I want to continue my Multi-CAD / PDM discussion and propose possible alternatives for MultiCAD / PDM integration strategy. I can see three possible options: Multi-CAD PDM, Multi-PDM CAD, CAD-PDM bundle. Let me put some analyzes below.

Multi-CAD PDM

This is a traditional option used today by most of the vendors. The integration plug-ins need to be developed between PDM and multiple CAD systems. In that configuration, PDM normally provide an integration framework – environment that allows CAD systems to interplay with PDM environment. Some CAD operations are replaced with PDM operations – Open / Save. Additional operations added by PDM environment in order to manage changes of files and access specific PDM functions. The main assumption of this approach is that it reflects the situation majority customers have- single PDM system and multiple CAD systems.

Multi-CAD PDM

CAD / PDM bundle

This is an option that became more popular for last 3-4 years. Because of CAD/PDM integration complexity and high demand for vertical integration, software vendors are trying to solve this problem for their own CAD and PDM systems. As a result, stable bundles became  more popular. It solves the problem CAD-PDM version compatibility, updates as well as functional richness. These are most popular bundles – Inventor / Autodesk Vault, SolidWorks / EPDM, SolidEgde (NX) / TeamCenter, CATIA / Enovia, Creo-Parametric / Windchill. The high-end systems like CATIA, NX and Creo-Parametric becomes even more complex. CATIA was the first system that requires Enovia functionality and cannot work without data management backend.

CAD-PDM Bundle

Multi-PDM CAD

This is an interesting option, in my view. The idea behind is that CAD system openness and Open API will be available ad-hoc to integrate with any PDM system. Sounds like a dream? Maybe… Nevertheless, I believe this is one of the forthcoming ways to create a stable integration. With the future migration of CAD systems to cloud, CAD API will move to web  infrastructure, which can be used to higher standardization of integration mechanisms.

Multi-PDM CAD

What is my conclusion? In order to solve CAD / PDM integration complexity we need to move towards higher level of decoupling and openness. It includes open API and standard protocols. Smart vendors will be moving towards this direction. It will simplify system usage from end-user standpoint as well as from the side of system administration and updates. Just my thoughts… What is your take?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 August, 2010

Summer is vacation time. I spent first week of August in Orlando Disney Word with family and my photo camera....

7 December, 2011

Back to the beginning of this year, I came with the post – Integrating PLM and PDM. Wrong question? My...

3 December, 2012

The complexity of user interface in PLM applications is a well-known fact that acknowledged by almost all PLM vendors today....

19 July, 2010

The things are moving fast these days. One of the most fascinating trends is the emerging connection between physical and...

30 December, 2015

Standards are similar toothbrushes. Everyone need one, but nobody wants to somebody else standard. CAD and PLM solutions are supporting...

26 August, 2010

I read one of the latest VEKTORRUM re-posts about Autodesk and PLM. Navigate your browser to the following link and read...

25 November, 2019

I’m still digesting tons of information I’ve got last week during AU2019 in Las Vegas. I will continue to share...

21 December, 2011

Cost is an important topic. Period. Everybody agrees with this statement. I can even say many companies investing a lot...

31 December, 2019

Earlier this month, I shared my thoughts about what happened with PDM for the last 10 years? PDM was an...

Blogroll

To the top