A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The future battle for PLM upfront cost

The future battle for PLM upfront cost
Oleg
Oleg
4 November, 2013 | 3 min for reading

PLM-zero-upfront-cost

Transformation of business models is one of the most important trends that happens today in the industry. Take a deep breath… it doesn’t mean companies don’t want to be compensated for the work they do. These days it is just about how to define the right business model that reflecting the relationships between all participants in the business.

The last tsunami related to the software price happened after recent announcement of Apple to make lot of their software including their OSX free. Over the weekend, I’ve been reading Forbes article – The Upfront Software Price is Now Free. Read the article and draw your conclusion. Even if the majority of the focus is related to what happens between major software giants – Microsoft, Apple and Google, in my view, it will have an impact on enterprise software too. The following passage is important.

With software being distributed either as web applications or through models that required a connection to the internet, software gained the ability to be distributed on a subscription basis or subsidized through advertising. Over the past few years, application software has increasingly moved to an initial price point that edges closer to zero on a consistent basis.

It made me think that changes of distribution model can be an additional driver to transform them way PLM (and other enterprise software) will be distributed and licensed.

The discussion about PLM software price, licenses and total cost of ownership is not new. First time I raised the question about coming business model transformation on my blog back in 2009 – Is Free the future of PLM? Since that time, the discussion went in different directions. You probably remember the Future PLM business models panel discussion I moderated during PLM Innovation 2012 in Munich. Another post, which is actually very co-sound with the idea of transformation as a result of changes in distribution model – PLM Cloud and Software licensing transformation.

However, in addition to cloud, SaaS and Web, there is another driving force behind changing PLM software business model. It is open source. Take a look here – PLM: Open Source vs. Free. In my view, open source is another powerful opportunity to change PLM business model status quo. In PLM business, Aras Corp. is driving this change since 2007 by promoting a very unique “Enterprise Open Source” model. Navigate to another article just published on Aras website – PLM Licensing is so Old School. Here is an interesting passage:

If your PLM software deployment gains wide-spread adoption (a goal of every successful PLM implementation), you will need to purchase more licenses. PLM license expenses can be huge up-front, but broad, global roll-outs are where the costs absolutely skyrocket. Effectively, the PLM project becomes a victim of its own success.

The last point about PLM upfront licenses preventing wider adoption of PLM software in the organization is interesting. PLM vendors are looking towards how to make PLM products available downstream in manufacturing organizations as well as in the supply chain. The high end-user cost is clearly not helping to make this dream come true.

What is my conclusion? In my view, PLM cost future trajectory is going towards “usage” and not “upfront cost”. It is true in other places, but for PLM it can be a significant change that energize future increase in PLM software adoption and… consumption. It will be driven by major factors such as internet distribution channels as well as open source and service engagements. I don’t see big difference here – both strategies basically removes upfront cost and focus on usage. The changes are unavoidable. Business transformation train left the station. It is just a question of time. In my view, all PLM vendors are actively researching what does it mean for their current businesses and how to act (or react). Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 January, 2013

Bill of Materials. Probably the key element in product development and manufacturing. Surprisingly enough, many companies are still struggling with...

21 August, 2009

Interesting prompt related to Mashup services. I just heard that Microsoft will discontinue their Popfly mashup service on Aug-24. Minute...

16 June, 2024

Timing is everything in business. Manufacturing industry combining supply chain management, product lifecycle and product development process are offering a...

16 July, 2012

For many years, Microsoft and Office were 100% associated with PC. Not any more. If you follow earlier news from...

21 July, 2009

In the early beginning of the Internet in the late 80s of 20th Century, MIT professor Tom Malone started to...

17 September, 2015

One size doesn’t fit all. This is very true for engineering and manufacturing. Product lifecycle is a term that I...

12 October, 2010

I loved this – “Look ma, no hands”. Did you try it in your childhood? Even so, I’m sure it...

15 April, 2013

I’ve been attended COFES 2013 earlier last week. For those of you not familiar with the event, navigate your browser...

26 June, 2014

The race toward efficient cloud sharing of files and other information is heating up. While typical photo sharing application is...

Blogroll

To the top