A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Is it time for a synchronized Bill of Materials?

Is it time for a synchronized Bill of Materials?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
2 April, 2009 | 2 min for reading

In my previous post “Search for the right BOM – I’m feeling lucky? “, I started to discover possible ways to handle Bill of Materials in the organization and extended enterprise. Thank you all for your comments. I think we had a good conversation, so  I’d like to continue now in slightly different direction. Before I speak  about the diversity of Bill of Materials I’d like to say that the core of this approach is to have multiple Bill of Materials for various aspects of product development (such as Design, Engineering. Manufacturing, Maintenance etc.). So, we have multiple Bill of Materials. These multiple Bill of Materials are managed normally by different systems. By using of this approach we have several possible combinations of BOM within an organization.

But there is opposite approach: There are NO multiple Bill of Materials. Instead we have systems that define a single BOM for the organization where all relevant pieces of information are connected and synchronized. According to the type of information you are looking for, you can extract a subset of this information from the overall Bill of Materials system. This overall BOM structures managed and synchronized among all groups within an organization. Therefore, this approach can simplify the way different pieces of product-related information are managed in an organization.

synchronized-bom

 How can you organize this synchronized Bill of Material overall? There are many technological approaches that can be mentioned here – PLM with federated Bill of Material capabilities, data warehousing, business intelligence, PIM, and enterprise search. Even if these approaches are sensitive from the standpoint of synchronizing information between different enterprise systems, all of these technologies have the potential to be used for this purpose.

 I would be interested to know if you see the practice of a synchronized Bill of Materials applicable in your organization.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networks.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 January, 2010

Last week I had chance to read Forbes’s article (Listen To Competitors — Not Customers), which made me think more...

2 January, 2017

IoT is a topic that raises many debates these days. Speaking to engineering and manufacturing IT people I can see...

8 March, 2011

Earlier today, I discovered an interesting company solution called Tigertext. At the time companies are talking about 2D vs. 3D...

13 January, 2014

Crossing boundaries is always lots of fun and opportunities. In blogging, it usually sparks so many discussions between people you...

30 May, 2012

Time is flying. My monthly top 5 posts are coming too fast. Which made me think about so many changes...

11 February, 2016

Once open source software was a no-go solution in enterprise software. I remember debates and discussions about open-source code with...

22 October, 2009

I’d like to continue the discussion about the Bill of Materials. I learned a lot from previous posts. Thank you all for...

13 January, 2022

Has your business fully adopted cloud-based CAD? While the technology has been around for more than a decade, the jury...

2 March, 2024

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the integration of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems is...

Blogroll

To the top