A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?
Oleg
Oleg
9 April, 2015 | 2 min for reading

slack-image

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you work on the same team and between teams can be a critical factor to make project successful. I’ve been learning Slack for the last few weeks. Slack is online communication platform that is catching lot of attention for the last time. It is a startup with more than $1B valuation. Take a look on it over the weekend. It is polished and provides very slick UI.

My experience with Slack made me think about collaboration in engineering teams. It has some connection to old discussions about “social PLM”. However, social PLM idea was doomed. I can mention few reasons why it happened – it provided bad experience for communication, it wasn’t open and didn’t provide an easy way to publish data.

slack-integrations

Things changed for the last few years, Engineering software is getting better in terms of user experience, but openness and integration are two things that not changing much. Look over collaboration tools provided by PLM vendors and you will see limited number of integration capabilities. It is still very closed world, it is hard to push data in and out. Moreover, it is very difficult to integrate with tools engineers are using these days.

Opposite to that Slack impressed me with the number of integrations and openness. If you think about online digital environment, it basically integrates with everything. Navigate to the following link and take a look on a number of integrations. However, community-built integrations list is every more impressive. It is basically integrates to any language, framework or too.

What is my conclusion? There is a clear need for engineers to communicate. However, think how many social platforms do we need? My hunch- we don’t need many. But we need one… a good one. We need one for engineers to communicate between themselves and outside world. So, the competition for this single communication tool will be tough. In my view, integration will be one of the most critical elements. Imagine great communication and collaboration platform that hard to integrate with. It will fail exactly in the same way as previous “social PLM” initiatives failed. So, there is a chance engineers will like Slack. This is a lesson to learn for PLM vendors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 December, 2016

Are you familiar with famous definition of pornography used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart? Check...

9 September, 2010

I had a chance to read AESSIS blog post – Why Some People Don’t Like PLM? Graham started absolutely important...

26 February, 2015

It is not uncommon to hear about “changing paradigms” in different domains these days. We are watching Netflix and disconnecting...

15 April, 2014

Collaboration is the name of the game today for many vendors. CAD and PLM vendors are included. Cloud technology is...

12 November, 2014

User experience is in focus these days. Slowly, but surely enterprise software companies are coming to the point of understanding...

20 July, 2016

Nobody is surprised by the amount of distributed work we do these days. The time when designers, engineers and manufacturing...

18 September, 2019

Last year, I asked if the Salesforce platform can accelerate cloud PLM. if you missed my article navigate your browser...

20 February, 2019

PLM for SMB is a long time dream of PLM minded community. Check articles online to see it is actually...

29 September, 2017

Last week I attended Autodesk Accelerate event in Boston. If you missed my notes, you can catchup here. One of...

Blogroll

To the top