A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?
Oleg
Oleg
9 April, 2015 | 2 min for reading

slack-image

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you work on the same team and between teams can be a critical factor to make project successful. I’ve been learning Slack for the last few weeks. Slack is online communication platform that is catching lot of attention for the last time. It is a startup with more than $1B valuation. Take a look on it over the weekend. It is polished and provides very slick UI.

My experience with Slack made me think about collaboration in engineering teams. It has some connection to old discussions about “social PLM”. However, social PLM idea was doomed. I can mention few reasons why it happened – it provided bad experience for communication, it wasn’t open and didn’t provide an easy way to publish data.

slack-integrations

Things changed for the last few years, Engineering software is getting better in terms of user experience, but openness and integration are two things that not changing much. Look over collaboration tools provided by PLM vendors and you will see limited number of integration capabilities. It is still very closed world, it is hard to push data in and out. Moreover, it is very difficult to integrate with tools engineers are using these days.

Opposite to that Slack impressed me with the number of integrations and openness. If you think about online digital environment, it basically integrates with everything. Navigate to the following link and take a look on a number of integrations. However, community-built integrations list is every more impressive. It is basically integrates to any language, framework or too.

What is my conclusion? There is a clear need for engineers to communicate. However, think how many social platforms do we need? My hunch- we don’t need many. But we need one… a good one. We need one for engineers to communicate between themselves and outside world. So, the competition for this single communication tool will be tough. In my view, integration will be one of the most critical elements. Imagine great communication and collaboration platform that hard to integrate with. It will fail exactly in the same way as previous “social PLM” initiatives failed. So, there is a chance engineers will like Slack. This is a lesson to learn for PLM vendors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 June, 2009

I have a crazy idea to discuss today. I’d like to talk about a topic that we like very much...

5 June, 2018

One of PLM projects I’ve been following for long time is Siemens PLM Active Workspace. It was first introduced 6...

26 October, 2015

Historically, PLM products are well know for being complicated and hard to use. It has deep roots in the way...

16 November, 2009

Reading over the weekend ZDNet post, “Why IT cannot seem to deliver measurable productivity”, I started to think about how...

17 May, 2015

I’m in Dallas, TX for the next few days to attend Siemens PLM Connection 2015 conference. Teamcenter is one of...

28 September, 2009

Short prompt in the beginning of the week. I was reading post from BSW “Killer Ideas And Controlled Innovation: Why...

9 June, 2024

The reality of every engineering team or manufacturing enterprise is multiple systems. For the last 20+ years, the question of...

1 June, 2016

I remember first time I was introduced to AutoLISP. It was many years ago, but I can still recall how...

1 March, 2017

Collaboration is one of the most prominent values offered by PLM vendors. Product development and manufacturing is a team effort...

Blogroll

To the top