A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?
Oleg
Oleg
9 April, 2015 | 2 min for reading

slack-image

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you work on the same team and between teams can be a critical factor to make project successful. I’ve been learning Slack for the last few weeks. Slack is online communication platform that is catching lot of attention for the last time. It is a startup with more than $1B valuation. Take a look on it over the weekend. It is polished and provides very slick UI.

My experience with Slack made me think about collaboration in engineering teams. It has some connection to old discussions about “social PLM”. However, social PLM idea was doomed. I can mention few reasons why it happened – it provided bad experience for communication, it wasn’t open and didn’t provide an easy way to publish data.

slack-integrations

Things changed for the last few years, Engineering software is getting better in terms of user experience, but openness and integration are two things that not changing much. Look over collaboration tools provided by PLM vendors and you will see limited number of integration capabilities. It is still very closed world, it is hard to push data in and out. Moreover, it is very difficult to integrate with tools engineers are using these days.

Opposite to that Slack impressed me with the number of integrations and openness. If you think about online digital environment, it basically integrates with everything. Navigate to the following link and take a look on a number of integrations. However, community-built integrations list is every more impressive. It is basically integrates to any language, framework or too.

What is my conclusion? There is a clear need for engineers to communicate. However, think how many social platforms do we need? My hunch- we don’t need many. But we need one… a good one. We need one for engineers to communicate between themselves and outside world. So, the competition for this single communication tool will be tough. In my view, integration will be one of the most critical elements. Imagine great communication and collaboration platform that hard to integrate with. It will fail exactly in the same way as previous “social PLM” initiatives failed. So, there is a chance engineers will like Slack. This is a lesson to learn for PLM vendors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 January, 2019

Welcome to another weekly update about my video blog – Musings about Bill of Materials.. I spent last discussing various...

8 May, 2022

Manufacturing is a process that has been around for centuries and is still relied on today to produce products. Despite...

28 April, 2009

There is no doubt a search changed the way we work today on the Internet. Remember how looked for  information...

8 October, 2010

The following Google Apps Blog caught my attention few days ago – More Tools For Viewing Document Revisions. I found...

2 October, 2022

The digital thread is a concept that has been preached by many in the manufacturing industry for years. The idea...

20 April, 2018

Bad terminology is an enemy of good thinking. A running joke in PLM industry says that if you ask what...

11 August, 2013

I’m relaxing in sunny Tel-Aviv, removing jet lag and preparing for coming working week here. For those of you not...

26 February, 2009

Since last year, I have seen many discussions on the Web about PLM 2.0. The number of posts is growing…...

28 February, 2018

PDM (or PLM) was born as idea of centralization of data and processes under single roof (actually database).  Back 30-40...

Blogroll

To the top