A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?
Oleg
Oleg
9 April, 2015 | 2 min for reading

slack-image

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you work on the same team and between teams can be a critical factor to make project successful. I’ve been learning Slack for the last few weeks. Slack is online communication platform that is catching lot of attention for the last time. It is a startup with more than $1B valuation. Take a look on it over the weekend. It is polished and provides very slick UI.

My experience with Slack made me think about collaboration in engineering teams. It has some connection to old discussions about “social PLM”. However, social PLM idea was doomed. I can mention few reasons why it happened – it provided bad experience for communication, it wasn’t open and didn’t provide an easy way to publish data.

slack-integrations

Things changed for the last few years, Engineering software is getting better in terms of user experience, but openness and integration are two things that not changing much. Look over collaboration tools provided by PLM vendors and you will see limited number of integration capabilities. It is still very closed world, it is hard to push data in and out. Moreover, it is very difficult to integrate with tools engineers are using these days.

Opposite to that Slack impressed me with the number of integrations and openness. If you think about online digital environment, it basically integrates with everything. Navigate to the following link and take a look on a number of integrations. However, community-built integrations list is every more impressive. It is basically integrates to any language, framework or too.

What is my conclusion? There is a clear need for engineers to communicate. However, think how many social platforms do we need? My hunch- we don’t need many. But we need one… a good one. We need one for engineers to communicate between themselves and outside world. So, the competition for this single communication tool will be tough. In my view, integration will be one of the most critical elements. Imagine great communication and collaboration platform that hard to integrate with. It will fail exactly in the same way as previous “social PLM” initiatives failed. So, there is a chance engineers will like Slack. This is a lesson to learn for PLM vendors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 September, 2019

For the last several weeks, we had a few very interesting discussions about PLM standards. Manufacturing companies are demanding standards...

2 April, 2020

I attended the first virtual CIMdata PLM market forum last week. If you missed my earlier article check them here...

4 April, 2021

Data is everywhere these days and I see more and more people taking data seriously when it comes to the...

7 May, 2023

Earlier this week, I attended PLM Roadmap, a CIMdata event. I gave it a preview in my earlier article including...

28 September, 2025

I’m still digesting everything I saw and heard at Autodesk University 2025. Each year, AU gives us a glimpse into...

26 May, 2021

I started my series of articles about PLM and ERP by speaking about PLM vs ERP Tug of War, continued...

21 September, 2010

Last week I had healthy debates with one of my blog readers about different options to deploy PLM for the...

22 September, 2017

Industry is transforming these days. As part of business transformation, engineering and manufacturing software vendors are changing the way software...

30 April, 2014

One of my favorite keynotes last week at COFES 2014 took me to the definition of time paradox and how different...

Blogroll

To the top