A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Do We Need Personal PLM?

Do We Need Personal PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
9 March, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’ve been observing a significant increase in the availability of personal services in today’s software and solution offerings. Many examples of social design are focusing on the ability to design products with a “personal touch”. In addition, there is a very strong trend called “personal web”, which is collects content, tools and capabilities from the Web that has configured and focused on a particular user. It started from personal pages and configurations and continued to provide tools for tags, categorizing, sorting, searching and re-assembling (aggregation). People create a customized environment and tools are focused on the same process.

Now, how can this be related to Product Lifecycle Management? In the past, we considered PLM as an enterprise system that focused on business processes and followed product kifecycles from the earliest idea time through to disposal. Is there a place to inject “personal PLM” into current concepts of PLM? Does it make sense for PLM to put spotlight personal activity rather than the overall process? Don’t get me wrong J… I’m not saying that processes are bad in general. I’m just saying that processes need to happen, but people need to focus on their personal activities and the content that they need to create.

So, what is the idea? I was looking at some of the today’s examples of personal web in the areas of community building, self learning, and library management. I find this example of PLE (Personal Learning Environment) as interesting as the prototype of a personal PLM system.

Bellow one of the examples of PLE http://edtechpost.wikispaces.com/PLE+Diagrams

Another example of personalization is the creation of widgets and tools that allow you to aggregate PLM content differently. Take a look on the following example of pageflakes (a system that lets you aggregate content from different Websites).

pageflakes

Product Lifecycle Management Tools today (even those tools that aren’t referred to as PLM) provide a very traditional set of tools focused on design (i.e. CAD), engineering (i.e. BOM), simulation (i.e. CAE) and other domains. If we can find a way to re-aggregate capabilities provided by these tools using modern SOA technologies to create a personalized combination of tools or a working environment, we can significantly improve the way people work today in product development 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 January, 2019

It is not a secret that PLM has strong roots in engineering. PLM was born as an extension of CAD...

3 April, 2014

I’m coming again to this topic – User Interface. These days you can hear about it as user experience (UX)....

11 January, 2010

We tend to use word “collaboration” very often in Product Lifecycle Management and related fields. Collaborative Design, Collaboration Product Data...

25 August, 2020

PLM is too complex and too expensive. I’ve heard it many times, especially from medium-size and small manufacturing companies. Licenses,...

12 February, 2015

I will taking time off with family next week. It is hard to pull the plug and disconnect from “Beyond...

19 May, 2014

In the beginning was CAD and CAD was the only important system for engineers. Then came PDM… In my view,...

31 July, 2015

Have you heard about hackathons? According to wikipedia, hackathon or “hack days” is an event where software engineers including designers,...

28 July, 2009

I think, PLM evolved for the last few years to become accepted by many companies. Started from bigger auto- and...

29 June, 2018

Who will win cloud war? BOLD business article brings an interesting comparison between vendors and the funny picture I reference above....

Blogroll

To the top