A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open Source: Is the Game Changing for PLM?

Open Source: Is the Game Changing for PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 March, 2009 | 2 min for reading

In my view, open source (or more precisely –open source software) is becoming more and more visible in the business of enterprise software. 

There is an important characteristic of PLM related to business that we need to keep in mind in order to analyze the impact of open source on PLM. There is a high segmentation of customer requirements for different industries and customers needs for different types of customers. Today’s “mindset PLM leaders” still are not capable of covering the full scope of customers’ needs. This topic makes open source both attractive and disruptive for PLM.

 On one hand, when there are many common customer requirements, open source is very beneficial.  Users have an ability to submit code from all participants of open source, for example, as in a Linux system. This scale up is very significant and allows us to develop big systems according to communities of users. But, at the same time, if there are quite many different requirements this can disadvantage of open source. 

In addition, due to the high percentage of services and customization, the ability to deliver overall PLM project as services without licenses cost is a significant advantage and changes the game of PLM system implementation. So for this type of customers, open source will probably be beneficial. At the same time, smaller customers will be more interested in standardized functionality with fixed cost that will allow them to achieve their ROI goals and less interesting when implementation turns to services projects. 

My conclusion – on one hand, open source in general and open source PLM specifically brings a significant improvement in the way we create systems for our customers. These models shift the initial discussion from license selling to customer requirements. On the other hand, it’s not clear how IP protection in different organizations will allow the crowdsourcing of open sources and common delivery in this field. This happened successfully with different non-PLM software, so it’s definitely a place we need to watch in the future.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 November, 2012

Experience. This word is getting into our lexicon and we start using it often. It is a nice word. We...

3 January, 2011

I’ve read the following article Oracle butts into online collaboration space with Cloud Office. It struck me as something important....

28 January, 2012

What do you think about the future designer workspace? I assume some of my readers remember drawing board in multiple...

23 March, 2019

TGIF. It is a time to think about an everlasting topic – debates about PLM complexity. I was happy to...

5 May, 2018

Technology and marketing are often going side by side. Today, I want to talk about SOA (service oriented architecture), web...

5 November, 2021

As COVID hit the world, the PLM industry, like many other industries, made an interesting trajectory from traditional (physical) events...

19 July, 2010

My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. The original post is here. If you listened to the news stream from Microsoft...

17 June, 2013

Sunday is a good day to dream and think about something completely crazy and impossible. More than four years ago...

19 December, 2011

Companies are looking for differentiation in the way they are making business. PLM companies are not different. Dassault, PTC, Siemens...

Blogroll

To the top