A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

5 reasons why Wiki fails for PLM collaboration

5 reasons why Wiki fails for PLM collaboration
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 April, 2009 | 3 min for reading

In the last few posts, I wrote about how you can use Enterprise 2.0 tools to improve various processes related to product development. I think that Wiki is an easy collaborative platform. I also think that Wikis have a great potential to be transformed into something that bigger from which smaller enterprises can benefit. At the same time, over the past few weeks, I tried to experiment with Wiki platforms.

 My initial proposition was to use Wiki as content space to keep information for collaborative usage. I don’t think this is a very new and fresh idea, but I wanted to see how it would be possible to use existing tools without significant modifications.

 Below is my conclusion regarding the weak sides of the Wiki story for product collaboration:

1.       Information Access. The biggest advantage of Wiki is simplicity. But this means that Wiki is completely flat. You don’t have any way of organizing access to information rather than creating of pages / sub-pages and links between them. When you deal with short flat pages it works well. When you start to add more complex content, it becomes unusable. I found that the simplest way ,to search for information was a browser embedded search (even though theChrome search is quite good, it wasn’t very simple to find what I needed. If you have multiple Wikis, you have the problem of information being separated and not accessible across Wikis.

2.       Content Maintenance. It’s very simple to insert information and update a Wiki. Butm at the same time, you have to take care of all the information there. This means that you can’t maintain your content with rules and logic. This is not a good way to organize it. You need to take care of the content or else it turns into garbage very quickly.

3.       Updates. I didn’t find any way to maintain automatic and dependency in updates of content. This is creates cumbersome situation when I need to update information I already put in wiki, but keep history of my updates. Quite straightforward requirements in our space, but hardly can be achievable out of the box.

4.       Integration. This disappointed me very much. The only way to integrate Wikis is to put hyperlinks on the relevant information. But what if this information is located in other systems / storages and formats?. I didn’t find any way to mashup information inside a Wiki page. Although Web Parts or similar functionality is available, it breaks the  page into segments and is not as good as what I want.

5.       Structural Information. This is a higher degree of content maintenance, but a very important one, in my opinion. Product information is highly structured by nature. Maintaining this information only by URL/links mechanisms is not trivial. So, the structure of information is probably a very desired feature.

Therefore, what is my conclusion? The Wiki collaborative mechanism is very nice and simple. It provides a very affordable way of collaborating and co-editing information. It seems hard to balance between the benefits and burdens of Wiki on the user.. I’d like to hear your opinions and experience of applying Wiki technologies.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 October, 2013

Technology space is good about inventing new jobs, titles and responsibilities. Until now, we knew about CEO, COO, CIO… The...

20 October, 2015

Technology is moving forward. The last wave of the development in cloud and mobile technologies, data management and collaboration created...

19 January, 2009

Social networks and social activities is drawing more and more focus in our life. Crowdsourcing has become very popular in...

13 January, 2018

One of my ‘burning questions” for PLM in 2018 is about value of data. Check my article (here). What PLM...

5 April, 2013

Working with engineers is like herding cats. Try to put few engineers in a room and get an agreement. If...

20 April, 2017

Cloud PLM adoption is on the top of minds for software vendors and PLM researchers. Catch up on the topic...

6 January, 2021

Each time any major PLM vendor makes a big step onto the acquisition path, the questions about how the technologies...

14 December, 2011

Mobile becomes more and more important in our everyday life. “You don’t have to be at your desk to make...

29 March, 2016

Cloud is a big buzzword these days and all PLM vendors are trying to use to their own advantage. Last...

Blogroll

To the top