A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should Engineers Take Care of ERP?

Should Engineers Take Care of ERP?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 May, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’d like to discuss the relationship in the organization between two major classes of software – PLM (CAD, CAE, PDM) and ERP. I think that the integration of PLM and ERP is not a new topic. There are many blog posts, researches, products and implementations done in this space. So, before deciding to go and discuss my ideas about how we can improve this relationship, I’d like to ask a question in a slightly different way: Should Engineers take care of ERP? In my view, there are two major patterns happening today in the PLM-ERP world which I’d identify as follows:

Pattern 1: Close Space. Engineering Systems is a closed environment focused on their specific engineering tasks and limiting their communication with ERP space. These systems send/receive very essential information such as product design (CAD model, drawings) and identifications such as Part Numbers. What is typical for this pattern is that both these environments (PLM and ERP?)  seems to have a status quo (an unwritten agreement) about not crossing borders and feel very comfortable with this agreement. It looks like the people responsible for both implementations are saying “don’t touch me and I will not touch you”.  I’ve seen people defending this position by saying that enterprise organizations need to be managed by siloes.  So, Engineering and ERP are different silos and need to be managed separately.

Pattern 2: Open Space. Engineering Systems see ERP as an essential part of their business relations in a very closed manner. It means that both system classes are focused on how to leverage information and processes between these two spaces. ERP can provide the engineering environment with business insight on how they need to design products – business and manufacturing information, customer info, logistic and supply chain data. On the opposite side, if engineering processes can introduce product to manufacturing already in the early stages of development, these can be greatly appreciated by manufacturing and their ability to optimize product design using manufacturing feedback.

In my view pattern 2 is something to which the future belongs. Engineers are the most important source of IP (Intellectual Property) in the company. They design products and create IP. Companies need to focus on how to get this IP out of engineering use it downstream. In addition, engineers need to take care and find a way to deliver the right ERP/Manufacturing data for CAD/PLM. In this way  they will be able to optimize product design already in the early stages of development.  In my opinion, PLM should take a leading role and engineers need to take care of ERP. I know it sounds strange, but only engineers know how to use information they create. Therefore, PLM needs to create a language and create tools and processes about how to take PLM IP downstream and integrate it with the manufacturing environment in your organization.

I’d be interested in discussing this topic and learn from your experience.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 January, 2017

Historically, engineering and manufacturing created a waterfall process. Some people called it “over the wall engineering“. To follow this process,...

17 December, 2017

Recent Forrester Wave report made some turbulence in PLM world. I shared my thoughts in my earlier blog –What I...

19 January, 2018

The topic of PLM ranking is getting some traction recently in the conversation with my readers and industry peers. Check...

15 January, 2014

The word “social” is getting into many places these days. However, very often, it is overloaded and misunderstood by people...

5 July, 2019

AI is a new trend. It brings a new wave of technological disruption across industries. Think about Web and Mobile...

21 April, 2016

Business environment is changing fast these days. For years, enterprise and manufacturing were very slow moving segments. Long production programs,...

4 May, 2009

Over the past few months, I have seen an increased volume of discussions related to the connection between CAD/PDM/PLM space...

6 March, 2023

I’m continuing to digest my 3DXW23 experience and what I learned. Design, engineering, and manufacturing are undergoing a radical transformation....

3 January, 2013

It is always interesting to take a look and see what posts drove the most attention of my readers in...

Blogroll

To the top