Short prompt. I want to continue theme related to PLM adoption. There are many talks about PLM deployment, ROI, Values etc. But does it make sense to create “good enough PLM”? What does it mean? What should be included?
This is my priority list:
1/ Flexibility
2/ Usability
3/ Integration
What do you think?
Many years ago, when screens were small and expensive, engineers used tablet surface to operation CAD systems. But this is...
For the last few years, we’ve said and heard a lot about cloud and PLM. Isn’t it a time for...
Timing is one of the most interesting and important elements success or failure of any projects. Right technology in a...
Yesterday discussion about PLM usability made me think more about how to come with ideas to improve usability of PLM...
One of my twitting buddies, Jonathan Scott, re-twitted the link to the following article – CIO Strategies: The Private and Public Clouds...
PLM was born as a strategy and technology for large organizations. These manufacturing companies supposed to have enough resources and...
Microsoft finally disclosed their plan to integrate their product FAST ESP, acquired for $1.2B from a Norwegian company, one of...
Among many topics I’m following, these two three letter acronyms are capable to ignite a discussion almost every single time....
The question of industry specific solutions in PLM was always interesting for me. Time ago, I asked in one of...