Short prompt. I want to continue theme related to PLM adoption. There are many talks about PLM deployment, ROI, Values etc. But does it make sense to create “good enough PLM”? What does it mean? What should be included?
This is my priority list:
1/ Flexibility
2/ Usability
3/ Integration
What do you think?
Sometime data management Q&A looks funny. World Online Review published the following solution on the request about how to migrate...
I’d like to continue discussion I started in my earlier post – Seven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials. So,...
In the rapidly evolving digital landscape, the integration of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems is...
Data formats is an interesting topic in the context of engineering and manufacturing. Manufacturing is relaying on a significant amount...
SharePoint is definitely moving forward. The latest Microsoft announcement folded Microsoft performance point and business process Management into its SharePoint...
Startup company and process management. These are probably two most conflicting definitions you might think about. Everyone is familiar with...
Few days ago, I captured the idea of building cloud PDM system on top of Dropbox infrastructure. It is hard...
PLM is certainly dealing with lots of data about products: design, engineering, lifecycle data, manufacturing, processes. When/If you speak to...
Google Wave gone. Developers moved to Facebook. Nevertheless, Google comes with an interesting Labs project Google Shared Space. You can...