A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why I haven’t bought PLM yet.

Why I haven’t bought PLM yet.
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
26 June, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Well, Product Lifecycle Management sounds like a very profound concept. I can see organizational benefits, values, etc… etc… But I’m not buying yet! You are probably familiar with such behavior – it all sounds good, but people are keeping their positions and not moving. So, I tried to analyze and talk with a few of our customers.

Here is my list of “why I’m not buying yet”?

1. Complexity. This is key. I mentioned it yesterday in a separate blog post called “Complexity Kills…”. It’s too complex to be true. I’m afraid that when I start following all the processes, recommendations, models, and user interfaces…. I see too much. So, in this situation, my reaction is – you guys are too smart and too complex for me.

2. Need to change the way I work. PLM comes with a state of mind “We know how to change it — believe me!” My user’s position here is that I want be able first to see how PLM handles my environment. So, from this standpoint, I want the company to be able to implement PLM, see how it works in not optimized way and then optimize everything.

3. Additional hassle to handle. Unfortunately, this is another system on the table. I need to learn it, handle it separately, ultimately work on this system separately. So, I don’t like this idea 🙂 …

4. Want LEGO approach. This is want I want. I want my PLM LEGOLAND. I want to add blocks as easily as possible – to play with them, allow to users to play with them, and only after we’ll see how it flies in the organization – by moving it to the user’s daily work. And… one more thing: Users need to be part of this process. They need to provide inputs interactively– not only to see it.

So, what is my bottom line? I want to go with the Toyota approach – “test before design”.  So, afterwards, we will make the system simple — the main approach will be to see how the system can work in the organization AS IS, use it, and improve it with small steps. All this will help people want to buy PLM to improve their daily work within their organizations.

What do you think?

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
11 March, 2016

Social was once was a hot topic in PLM industry eco-system. The use of social networks is increasing. The latest...

2 February, 2009

During the weekend, I was reading Mid-Market PLM Deployment Challenges by Tom Gill from CPDA. He wrote about multiple issues...

15 November, 2011

Process vs. Data. I think, this topic not requires a special introduction. In my view, every PLM implementation is facing...

22 April, 2018

I enjoyed the discussion around the article I published earlier this week – Model-based confusion in 3D CAD and PLM....

15 October, 2011

Product development and manufacturing is very different from company to company. Therefore, I’m not surprised anymore when I see multiple...

16 May, 2014

Have you heard about “150% BOM”? BOM management terminology is confusing sometimes. Ed Lopategui gave a shot to explain it in...

30 July, 2023

The process of transition from engineering to the manufacturing process is one of the most complex and requires a significant...

8 December, 2008

Sunday observation – Who will play role of Google Maps in PLM?  Google Maps plays significant role in development of...

9 December, 2014

I want to continue my series of thoughts about PLM and social technologies. If you missed the beginning, you can...

Blogroll

To the top