A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Top annoying things about PLM software.

Top annoying things about PLM software.
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
26 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

PLM as a combination of technologies, software, and methodology came long way from initial CAD systems, followed by CAE, Product Data Management and Collaboration Software. Some of the PLM-software components are very mature, but some of them are still in the early beginning. While we’ve innovated in many PLM products and technologies, we’ve also continued to disregard pre-existing PLM issues.

Here my list about top annoying things in PLM with no specific order, however, I do believe I started with the most significant ones.

PLM Implementation Scope. PLM software pretends on overall control of product IP and data. By saying that PLM companies, in my view, try to boil an ocean and claim to support unlimited capabilities in management of information and business processes around product development and manufacturing. Multiplied by marketing and sales, PLM creates perception of “do everything” software.

PLM Uniqueness. Ability to support a design process, manage product data and collaboration presented as unique capability of PLM software. Such position creates perception of premium value provided by PLM software and, very often, disregards other available alternatives in managing data and collaboration.

PLM Complexity. I have to admit product engineering and manufacturing are not a simple topic. To manage such processes and data, software needs to achieve a specific level of sophistication and complexity. However, in my view, PLM often exaggerated needed a complexity level and sophistication. In the end complexity creates a significant adoption rate problem. These time people like simple words and simple software.

Terminology. PLM domain created huge terminological barrier for people to get into this space. Number of multiple buzzwords and terms create difficulties to understand business purpose and capabilities of software. Heavy usage of overlapping and confusing terminology put a very significant constraint on ability to use software and tools that come from different software vendors.

Bizarre User Interface. Because of a long life cycle of a software product, user interface is something that was development during many years and contain multiple “historical reasons”. Even if during last few years, user experience was priorities by most software vendors in PLM space, this is still pace requirement multiple improvement and innovation.

Slooooow…. After all, performance isstill one ofthe most discussed issue software vendors isfocusing on. Refresh time, Render Time, regeneration, display, view etc. All these functions are very time consuming and contains space for innovation.

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 August, 2018

One of the most frequent debates in cloud (or SaaS) software are debates about tenancy. Or how you can often...

16 January, 2017

Historically, engineering and manufacturing created a waterfall process. Some people called it “over the wall engineering“. To follow this process,...

12 November, 2023

We live in a digital world. It doesn’t matter what we do and what business we are in, getting information...

3 January, 2024

Staying ahead of the other companies in a digital transformation is important. Engineering and manufacturing companies are looking how to...

6 December, 2010

I read the following blog post by Christine Longwell – Do we really need structured workflows if we have visibility...

28 May, 2014

To present product information visually is not a simple tasks. It combines multiple domains of information – 3D model, design...

26 January, 2019

Remember discussions about mass production and mass customization? I’ve been following this topic for quite some time from very early...

8 September, 2013

Everybody knows about open source software (OSS). The model of OSS skyrocketed for the last decade and made lots projects on the...

30 April, 2009

Today I would like to discuss PLM integrations. I see PLM as a business software that heavily relies on integration....

Blogroll

To the top