A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The Sink Hole of PLM Implementations?

The Sink Hole of PLM Implementations?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
28 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

unplanned-cost-roiThinking more about PLM implementation during last few days, I’d like to come and discuss few aspects of PLM implementation cost. Everything looks nice in the beginning of the PLM journey. Single point of truth, collaborative environment, business processes, support of the multiple integrated design environment. The sharp pencil of PLM strategy shows impressive ROI from PLM implementation. The question I want to come with is to analyze what is the potential source of unplanned PLM cost.

I see three core sources of unplanned PLM costs. Let’s talk about them in details.

1. Integration Cost in a diverse enterprise environment. It’s almost impossible to bring PLM solution in empty space. Normally, PLM comes to the organization already having some design and manufacturing environment.In some cases PLM strategy created for companies and organization having acquisition history and previous CAD/PDM/PLM/ERP implementations. PLM is naturally positioned as a mediator in business processes between existing design, manufacturing, supply chain, marketing and sales environments. Because of that integration of PLM into this environment is absolutely a requirement, but at the same time very underestimated by vendors and service providers. Addition unplanned cost came as a result of longer integration processes or unplanned works that need to be done to acquire data or integration functions.

2. Support of new PLM environments and versions. PLM implementation is spanning on a significant time frame. When working with multiple CAD/PDM/PLM software, coming from different vendors the new version can come with overlap to the PLM implementation or very soon after implementation release. To support new and updated software can be a second important source of waste and unplanned maintenance cost of PLM.

3. Implementation Change Cost. Business becomes very dynamic these days. “Build to change”- this is how modern business systems need to be created, in my view. Unfortunately, I don’t see many of today’s PLM software packages answer these needs. Adjustments and changes in PLM implementation are a third big danger for additional PLM implementation cost.So, far these are my top 3 sources of unplanned PLM cost? How do you see it? Have you had chance to experience something similar in your PLM projects?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 July, 2009

The following blog article by Anurag Batra drove my attention today – “Comparing BOM Structures: a multi-faceted need”. The author...

9 March, 2024

The discussion about PLM vs Excel is one of the long standing topics in PLM industry. I touched this topic...

27 October, 2019

Earlier this week, PTC announced about the acquisition of Onshape, the company started by a group of CAD industry veterans...

18 April, 2019

I’m continuing to share my favorite moments of COFES 2019 I attended last week. One of them is Eric Anderson’s...

17 September, 2010

I’ve been attending Technia PLM Innovation Forum early this week in Stockholm. My conclusion from this forum is that all...

13 March, 2013

Implementation of enterprise information systems is a long and painful process. It requires a lot of efforts, investments and planning....

28 January, 2010

    Well, it happened. Apple stretched up iPhone in size, removed camera and phone features. So, we have iPad...

3 May, 2012

It is hard to find a day without new announcement or breaking news related to the cloud these days. Companies...

26 November, 2015

I had a chance to present over the video to a selected group of professionals at INFUSEIT seminar in Oslo...

Blogroll

To the top