A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The Sink Hole of PLM Implementations?

The Sink Hole of PLM Implementations?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
28 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

unplanned-cost-roiThinking more about PLM implementation during last few days, I’d like to come and discuss few aspects of PLM implementation cost. Everything looks nice in the beginning of the PLM journey. Single point of truth, collaborative environment, business processes, support of the multiple integrated design environment. The sharp pencil of PLM strategy shows impressive ROI from PLM implementation. The question I want to come with is to analyze what is the potential source of unplanned PLM cost.

I see three core sources of unplanned PLM costs. Let’s talk about them in details.

1. Integration Cost in a diverse enterprise environment. It’s almost impossible to bring PLM solution in empty space. Normally, PLM comes to the organization already having some design and manufacturing environment.In some cases PLM strategy created for companies and organization having acquisition history and previous CAD/PDM/PLM/ERP implementations. PLM is naturally positioned as a mediator in business processes between existing design, manufacturing, supply chain, marketing and sales environments. Because of that integration of PLM into this environment is absolutely a requirement, but at the same time very underestimated by vendors and service providers. Addition unplanned cost came as a result of longer integration processes or unplanned works that need to be done to acquire data or integration functions.

2. Support of new PLM environments and versions. PLM implementation is spanning on a significant time frame. When working with multiple CAD/PDM/PLM software, coming from different vendors the new version can come with overlap to the PLM implementation or very soon after implementation release. To support new and updated software can be a second important source of waste and unplanned maintenance cost of PLM.

3. Implementation Change Cost. Business becomes very dynamic these days. “Build to change”- this is how modern business systems need to be created, in my view. Unfortunately, I don’t see many of today’s PLM software packages answer these needs. Adjustments and changes in PLM implementation are a third big danger for additional PLM implementation cost.So, far these are my top 3 sources of unplanned PLM cost? How do you see it? Have you had chance to experience something similar in your PLM projects?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 August, 2025

PDM businesses were built on the back of file-based CAD systems. Managing those files was a challenge, but after the...

28 December, 2024

In the previous article, Rethinking Change Management: Orchestrating Complexity Across Systems & Disciplines, Part 1: Collaborative Workspace, I explored how the...

9 October, 2009

The new efficiency is where cost saving, productivity and innovation meet. I was reading “The New Efficiency” letter from Steve...

26 June, 2016

  Internet browser is one of the most pervasive piece of software we use every day on our desktop, laptop...

6 December, 2013

I just came back from Autodesk University 2013 that took place earlier this week in freezing  Las Vegas. One of...

5 August, 2023

What is PLM? This question is accompany the product lifecycle management business for the last 20+ years. Started as a...

11 August, 2013

I’m relaxing in sunny Tel-Aviv, removing jet lag and preparing for coming working week here. For those of you not...

3 August, 2009

What is the role of Search in PLM? This is question I want to discuss today. This year is busy...

17 August, 2010

I want to continue the discussion started last week in my post ‘PDM vs. PLM: A Data Perspective‘. Thank you...

Blogroll

To the top