A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

The Sink Hole of PLM Implementations?

The Sink Hole of PLM Implementations?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
28 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

unplanned-cost-roiThinking more about PLM implementation during last few days, I’d like to come and discuss few aspects of PLM implementation cost. Everything looks nice in the beginning of the PLM journey. Single point of truth, collaborative environment, business processes, support of the multiple integrated design environment. The sharp pencil of PLM strategy shows impressive ROI from PLM implementation. The question I want to come with is to analyze what is the potential source of unplanned PLM cost.

I see three core sources of unplanned PLM costs. Let’s talk about them in details.

1. Integration Cost in a diverse enterprise environment. It’s almost impossible to bring PLM solution in empty space. Normally, PLM comes to the organization already having some design and manufacturing environment.In some cases PLM strategy created for companies and organization having acquisition history and previous CAD/PDM/PLM/ERP implementations. PLM is naturally positioned as a mediator in business processes between existing design, manufacturing, supply chain, marketing and sales environments. Because of that integration of PLM into this environment is absolutely a requirement, but at the same time very underestimated by vendors and service providers. Addition unplanned cost came as a result of longer integration processes or unplanned works that need to be done to acquire data or integration functions.

2. Support of new PLM environments and versions. PLM implementation is spanning on a significant time frame. When working with multiple CAD/PDM/PLM software, coming from different vendors the new version can come with overlap to the PLM implementation or very soon after implementation release. To support new and updated software can be a second important source of waste and unplanned maintenance cost of PLM.

3. Implementation Change Cost. Business becomes very dynamic these days. “Build to change”- this is how modern business systems need to be created, in my view. Unfortunately, I don’t see many of today’s PLM software packages answer these needs. Adjustments and changes in PLM implementation are a third big danger for additional PLM implementation cost.So, far these are my top 3 sources of unplanned PLM cost? How do you see it? Have you had chance to experience something similar in your PLM projects?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 December, 2018

Timing is everything in this life. And you cannot change it. Good skills and wrong timing still means no results....

18 June, 2010

Say “PLM” to anyone, and you hear the words “complex” and “expensive”. However, thinking about trajectories of different technologies, I...

11 August, 2012

Mobile is a big deal these days. The usage of mobile devices is skyrocketing. CAD and PLM vendors increased their...

25 February, 2009

In one of the previous posts , I thought about how it would be possible to use a WIKI engine to...

23 August, 2010

Manufacturing company enterprise landscape becomes more and more complex every year. Companies are implementing new products and versions of existing...

11 January, 2016

One of the fundamental things in product development and lifecycle is related to part numbering schemas. The discussion about part...

10 March, 2016

Machine learning is an interesting trend to observe today. Companies are placing big bets on machine learning algorithms and thinking...

20 January, 2025

Today, all leading PLM software vendors are selling solutions they call “digital”. I find this interesting because most of these...

22 January, 2009

How PLM can continue growth in today’s downturn economy? I think, this is time to get back and talk about...

Blogroll

To the top