A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 October, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’d like to continue discussion I started in my earlier postSeven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials. So, what are possible collisions on the way to the single bill of materials?. So, let’s take design, engineering and manufacturing bills. When I look on opposite sidesdesign and manufacturing, the purpose, and as a result, how these bills look like. Design bill started from CAD and, obviously, take as a starting point, design structure. So, we can get very structured bill of material. As opposite, manufacturing bill of material foundation is manufacturing process. The levels of manufacturing bill are driven by manufacturing process definitions, stocking and other elements of manufacturing process. What is the role of engineering bill? Do we need it?

If I’m looking from the perspective of needs, it looks like engineering bill is not needed (wait for a moment, don’t kill me now :)). Design Bill provides information about how my product structured. Manufacturing Bill provides information how my product will be assembled (or build). However, I found distance between these structures / views is a huge, connection between them is not obvious. This is, in my view, place where product lifecycle technologies need to be focused – to step beyond pure design or manufacturing structures to engineering level and build lean engineering bill of material that will become master BOM in the organization.

What are the advantages of such approach? Master Engineering Bill will be able to connect design elements, especially those that related to custom manufacturing and will provide set of configurable modules. Master Engineering bill will support different techniques to create a conditionbased structures and many others. From Manufacturing side, engineering bill will get required information about Item MastersDifferent elementsdesign and manufacturing, will be interconnected in this engineering bill, so no more missing parts or impossible product options.

What are the disadvantages of such approach? I see two major problemsneed to build unified data structure and synchronization work between department and people. The multiple bill of material approach solves problems of people collaboration and communication. Each department has their own bill, they are working on. The problem is in the endmissing parts on the shopfloor, missed dates or high product cost. In order to support, single Engineering Master Bill of Material, we need to find right technologies that allow to people to work simultaneously on different pieces of this bill, synchronize, change, update. This collective bill of material should be supported by PLM technologies looking on how to collaborate between design and manufacturing.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 February, 2020

Recent PLM Stack article – Thoughts about PLM Business Model caught my attention. Check this out here. The last decades...

29 October, 2022

In today’s digital world, everything is connected. We can order a pizza, track our fitness, and manage our finances with...

13 May, 2015

I’ve been reading a blog Getting PLM right: no one answer by Monica Schnitger. It is a slick writeup started from...

20 December, 2013

Communication and collaboration is an important part of every PLM solutions. To maintain an efficient way to communicate is not...

10 December, 2014

Cloud PLM adoption is growing. More PLM vendors these days are re-branding and re-building  product and software architecture to keep...

22 February, 2012

I’m just few hours before two-day marathon of PLM Innovation 2012 in Munich. The list of speakers and the agenda...

25 June, 2010

When you talk to a sales person from one of the PLM companies, you for sure will be exposed to...

15 November, 2016

I’m at AU2016 this week. Yesterday, I had a chance to attend Autodesk Forge Dev Day. It is a  gathering...

21 July, 2016

The data is ultimately important. Ask any engineer in a manufacturing company and he will answer you that he needs...

Blogroll

To the top