A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 October, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’d like to continue discussion I started in my earlier postSeven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials. So, what are possible collisions on the way to the single bill of materials?. So, let’s take design, engineering and manufacturing bills. When I look on opposite sidesdesign and manufacturing, the purpose, and as a result, how these bills look like. Design bill started from CAD and, obviously, take as a starting point, design structure. So, we can get very structured bill of material. As opposite, manufacturing bill of material foundation is manufacturing process. The levels of manufacturing bill are driven by manufacturing process definitions, stocking and other elements of manufacturing process. What is the role of engineering bill? Do we need it?

If I’m looking from the perspective of needs, it looks like engineering bill is not needed (wait for a moment, don’t kill me now :)). Design Bill provides information about how my product structured. Manufacturing Bill provides information how my product will be assembled (or build). However, I found distance between these structures / views is a huge, connection between them is not obvious. This is, in my view, place where product lifecycle technologies need to be focused – to step beyond pure design or manufacturing structures to engineering level and build lean engineering bill of material that will become master BOM in the organization.

What are the advantages of such approach? Master Engineering Bill will be able to connect design elements, especially those that related to custom manufacturing and will provide set of configurable modules. Master Engineering bill will support different techniques to create a conditionbased structures and many others. From Manufacturing side, engineering bill will get required information about Item MastersDifferent elementsdesign and manufacturing, will be interconnected in this engineering bill, so no more missing parts or impossible product options.

What are the disadvantages of such approach? I see two major problemsneed to build unified data structure and synchronization work between department and people. The multiple bill of material approach solves problems of people collaboration and communication. Each department has their own bill, they are working on. The problem is in the endmissing parts on the shopfloor, missed dates or high product cost. In order to support, single Engineering Master Bill of Material, we need to find right technologies that allow to people to work simultaneously on different pieces of this bill, synchronize, change, update. This collective bill of material should be supported by PLM technologies looking on how to collaborate between design and manufacturing.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 February, 2009

I’d like to discuss 3D. The following 3D Perspectives blog post “Do Designers Really Want to Communicate in 3D?” got...

18 February, 2011

In my view, Salesforce.com has been discovered a significant bias towards collaboration and collaborative software. Since last year Salesforce made...

12 March, 2018

For the last year, I’ve been sharing my thoughts about something I call new PLM paradigm. PLM started few decades...

18 July, 2018

Modern manufacturing world is all about communication and networking. Companies are hiring engineers all over the world. Contractors and suppliers...

6 April, 2017

In my earlier blog I demystified the notion of “monolithic” PLM marketing and shared some technological aspects related to PLM...

23 February, 2012

I had two very busy days in Munich attending PLM Innovation event. There were lots of great conversations, ideas and demos....

14 December, 2010

Ask people about the connection between CAD and PLM and you will discover a very interesting thing. In the past...

30 March, 2015

Cloud is transforming businesses and technologies. CAD and PDM are going to be transformed too. If you had a chance...

10 September, 2015

We don’t have to share the same room to work together these days. Business are discovering globalization option following customers...

Blogroll

To the top