A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 October, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’d like to continue discussion I started in my earlier postSeven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials. So, what are possible collisions on the way to the single bill of materials?. So, let’s take design, engineering and manufacturing bills. When I look on opposite sidesdesign and manufacturing, the purpose, and as a result, how these bills look like. Design bill started from CAD and, obviously, take as a starting point, design structure. So, we can get very structured bill of material. As opposite, manufacturing bill of material foundation is manufacturing process. The levels of manufacturing bill are driven by manufacturing process definitions, stocking and other elements of manufacturing process. What is the role of engineering bill? Do we need it?

If I’m looking from the perspective of needs, it looks like engineering bill is not needed (wait for a moment, don’t kill me now :)). Design Bill provides information about how my product structured. Manufacturing Bill provides information how my product will be assembled (or build). However, I found distance between these structures / views is a huge, connection between them is not obvious. This is, in my view, place where product lifecycle technologies need to be focused – to step beyond pure design or manufacturing structures to engineering level and build lean engineering bill of material that will become master BOM in the organization.

What are the advantages of such approach? Master Engineering Bill will be able to connect design elements, especially those that related to custom manufacturing and will provide set of configurable modules. Master Engineering bill will support different techniques to create a conditionbased structures and many others. From Manufacturing side, engineering bill will get required information about Item MastersDifferent elementsdesign and manufacturing, will be interconnected in this engineering bill, so no more missing parts or impossible product options.

What are the disadvantages of such approach? I see two major problemsneed to build unified data structure and synchronization work between department and people. The multiple bill of material approach solves problems of people collaboration and communication. Each department has their own bill, they are working on. The problem is in the endmissing parts on the shopfloor, missed dates or high product cost. In order to support, single Engineering Master Bill of Material, we need to find right technologies that allow to people to work simultaneously on different pieces of this bill, synchronize, change, update. This collective bill of material should be supported by PLM technologies looking on how to collaborate between design and manufacturing.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 May, 2023

Events are coming back. WHO chief declares end to COVID-19 as a global health emergency, which marks the end of...

13 February, 2019

I spent last few days attending SOLIDWORKS World 2019 in Dallas, TX. My timeline was very intense with many meetings,...

13 November, 2009

Interesting post drove my attention yesterday. Reading about the role of PLM as enterprise backbone, I wanted to raise a...

14 December, 2015

CAD and PLM companies are in a full swing to embrace IoT technologies. Why not? IoT is probably the most...

12 August, 2016

Flexibility was one of the key elements always demanded by engineering and manufacturing applications. The diversity of requirements is high...

8 January, 2010

I want to discuss what can be the next step in the development of social aspects of PLM tools as...

8 December, 2011

I’m sure, you are familiar with highway 101 crossing Silicon Valley. However, you probably never heard about PLM Highway in...

30 June, 2010

I’d like to continue discussion of Openness and PLM (see my yesterday post – Closed Thoughts about PLM Openness) with...

23 November, 2018

There are roughly 6,500 spoken languages in the world today. However, about 2,000 of those languages have fewer than 1,000...

Blogroll

To the top