A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?

BOM: Overstructured, Understructured or Lean?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 October, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’d like to continue discussion I started in my earlier postSeven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials. So, what are possible collisions on the way to the single bill of materials?. So, let’s take design, engineering and manufacturing bills. When I look on opposite sidesdesign and manufacturing, the purpose, and as a result, how these bills look like. Design bill started from CAD and, obviously, take as a starting point, design structure. So, we can get very structured bill of material. As opposite, manufacturing bill of material foundation is manufacturing process. The levels of manufacturing bill are driven by manufacturing process definitions, stocking and other elements of manufacturing process. What is the role of engineering bill? Do we need it?

If I’m looking from the perspective of needs, it looks like engineering bill is not needed (wait for a moment, don’t kill me now :)). Design Bill provides information about how my product structured. Manufacturing Bill provides information how my product will be assembled (or build). However, I found distance between these structures / views is a huge, connection between them is not obvious. This is, in my view, place where product lifecycle technologies need to be focused – to step beyond pure design or manufacturing structures to engineering level and build lean engineering bill of material that will become master BOM in the organization.

What are the advantages of such approach? Master Engineering Bill will be able to connect design elements, especially those that related to custom manufacturing and will provide set of configurable modules. Master Engineering bill will support different techniques to create a conditionbased structures and many others. From Manufacturing side, engineering bill will get required information about Item MastersDifferent elementsdesign and manufacturing, will be interconnected in this engineering bill, so no more missing parts or impossible product options.

What are the disadvantages of such approach? I see two major problemsneed to build unified data structure and synchronization work between department and people. The multiple bill of material approach solves problems of people collaboration and communication. Each department has their own bill, they are working on. The problem is in the endmissing parts on the shopfloor, missed dates or high product cost. In order to support, single Engineering Master Bill of Material, we need to find right technologies that allow to people to work simultaneously on different pieces of this bill, synchronize, change, update. This collective bill of material should be supported by PLM technologies looking on how to collaborate between design and manufacturing.

Just my thoughts.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 July, 2015

Disruption is a lovey topic to speculate just before the weekend. Aras-Airbus story gave a context to PLM industry analysts...

22 August, 2010

An interesting report was published by SearchManufacturingERP.com few days ago – Report: Wider access to 3D CAD images can improve PLM...

12 August, 2010

Scaling up is a tough problem. I want to talk today and PLM Software scalability in unusual aspects – business...

8 August, 2016

What can be easier than to put label on a piece of information online. Labeling (or tagging) became widely used...

15 January, 2022

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) become more prevalent, many businesses are starting to ask how they can...

18 September, 2014

The information about Aras PLM OEM deal with Infor caught my attention yesterday evening. It looks like a big deal...

30 November, 2014

I want to continue the discussion about data ownership and synchronization between islands of information in a company. EBOM and...

2 October, 2019

One of the most interesting trends today to watch is how all companies are transforming into technology companies. Manufacturing companies...

8 June, 2009

We have been talking about collaboration a lot these days. I was thinking about how collaboration can happen with designers....

Blogroll

To the top