A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Large Monolithic PLM Implementations Are a Thing of the Past

Large Monolithic PLM Implementations Are a Thing of the Past
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Continue my last week post about how to make next PLM implementation simpler, I decided to put some ideas towards how the next PLM implementations will look like.

PLM vendors are making huge efforts to simplify PLM deployment and make implementation simpler. Despite that, in my view, typical PLM implementation is still combined from three typical steps: a significant planning effort, deployment of software and additional customization and adaptation services. These steps make implementation expensive. Talking with PLM specialists and consultants you will learn the most important PLM activities are related to good planning upfront, methodologies and clarification of what organization need and how to math organizational needs to capabilities of the system. Gaps are covered by services.  It looks like a deadly connected circle. How we can break it?

I think many of PLM vendors and implementers made a misinterpretation of out-of-the box terms. What is currently proposed in PLM “out-of-the-box” package is an effort to create “standard PLM”. What you can hear around is additional activities how possible to create typical industry implementations, OEM/supplier oriented typical implementation, etc.

In my view, this is a dead-end in PLM evolution. Such efforts will be endless similar to multiple standard activities in product development. The main reason for that is because manufacturing these days need to be more agile, lean and dynamic to sustain in their business and making profit. When such fundamental for their product development system like PLM becomes “typical”, you cannot expect them to be dynamic, lean and efficient at the same time.

What is a possible solution? I think software vendors need to learn again lessons from 15-20 years back. In beginning of 90th, few companies were doing PDM. Such projects were considered as luxury, needed by big organizations only. PDM budgets started at six digits numbers and requires major involvement of software vendor, custom software builds and long project implementation time line. However, in the middle and end of 90th we had chance to see a strong trend towards flexible data models, inexpensive Windows based systems and as a result lower entry barrier for PDM implementation.

My conclusion today. Vendors need to leave magic-out-of-the-box marketing efforts and depart to the new station where we’ll able to find new engineering solution for old problem. Future systems will be adaptive, will not require a significant effort to deploy and implement.

Just my thoughts. YMMV…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 November, 2011

The last week snow in Boston was kind of an event. I think, many of New England residents are still...

29 June, 2020

I spent time over the weekend watching Siemens RealizeLIVE event recording and catching up on the news about the new...

23 August, 2017

AI is trending topic these days. AI enabled startups are everywhere and you can find many publications using term AI...

5 February, 2019

I’ve been following PI PLMx event in London yesterday and earlier today. While event is not over, I was able...

6 July, 2017

Engineering.com just published an article confirming that small design and engineering team aren’t interested much in buying and implementing data...

26 June, 2021

Efficiency and productivity are at the core of many decisions made by manufacturing companies. How to reduce the cost and...

19 April, 2016

Online experience was never as important for manufacturing companies as today. With growing amount of e-commerce, the ability of online...

30 April, 2009

The latest development in Product Lifecycle Management has raised the level of PLM systems with their ability to support wider...

7 June, 2011

I want to talk about the topic, which is actually is not very new – revisions. I was reading Autodesk...

Blogroll

To the top