A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 April, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I hope you know about my “love and hate” relationships with Excel. I posted many times about how deep Excel integrated into current CAD/PDM/PLM software life. Think about that, for the moment. You are getting Bill of Materials and Design Tables in CAD using Excel, lots of reports, catalogs and other data. There are lots of other reasons too. Just as an example you can take a look on one of my old “Excel” posts – Why Do I like My PLM Excel Spreadsheets?

About few months ago, I found an interesting Microsoft Live Lab product called “Pivot“. I posted about that. You can see my original post via this link. My initial thoughts were about how to try this pivot functionality on the real PLM data to see what is possible to achieve. Fortunately, this blog post got into attention of Simon Floyd from Microsoft, and he made this experiment. Last week at COFES 2010 during Maieutic Parataxis session, Simon presented his experiments. Full presentation from Maieutic Parataxis session will be available later this link. However, you can see some of the slides below.

I think, Pivot concept is an interesting experiment. Excel paradigm is very popular. At the same time, customer demands towards simple and clean user interfaces in PDM/PLM systems are very strong. Pivot can put lights on some potential in more deep exploration of Excel capabilities. Some of the visual representations in Pivot are similar to existing PLM products. Filtering and pivoting functionality is strong and interesting. To get information into Pivot can be challenging in my view.

What is my conclusion? PLM Pivot experiment requires attentions. Usability in PLM systems is a hard problem.Despite all claims mainstream customers are dissatisfied.  I’m very interesting to hear what do you think about this example? As usual, I’m looking forward to your comments.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 October, 2009

I’d like to continue the discussion about the Bill of Materials. I learned a lot from previous posts. Thank you all for...

3 January, 2021

The year 2021 is finally here. I’ve been taking some time off, to think about what we learned in 2020...

1 April, 2010

I think, buzzword compliance is a very important when you need to convince the company to use PLM. So, I...

20 October, 2024

The world of engineering and manufacturing software is evolving. Digital transformation plays a crucial role in driving the changes occurring...

18 September, 2012

One of the questions, that was very popular in my childhood was about “life on Mars”. Nowadays, thanks for NASA...

6 December, 2020

The discussion about single-tenant vs multi-tenant cloud PLM models is getting more interesting every day. And it is not only...

30 May, 2013

Enterprise software sucks. How many times we’ve heard that for the last 5 years? Probably too many… I remember one...

27 March, 2019

COFES (Congress on The Future of Engineering Software) is changing its location and transforming with a new leadership team. If...

16 July, 2020

The big news came yesterday – Siemens and SAP announced a new partnership. Here is the link to SAP announcement...

Blogroll

To the top