A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 April, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I hope you know about my “love and hate” relationships with Excel. I posted many times about how deep Excel integrated into current CAD/PDM/PLM software life. Think about that, for the moment. You are getting Bill of Materials and Design Tables in CAD using Excel, lots of reports, catalogs and other data. There are lots of other reasons too. Just as an example you can take a look on one of my old “Excel” posts – Why Do I like My PLM Excel Spreadsheets?

About few months ago, I found an interesting Microsoft Live Lab product called “Pivot“. I posted about that. You can see my original post via this link. My initial thoughts were about how to try this pivot functionality on the real PLM data to see what is possible to achieve. Fortunately, this blog post got into attention of Simon Floyd from Microsoft, and he made this experiment. Last week at COFES 2010 during Maieutic Parataxis session, Simon presented his experiments. Full presentation from Maieutic Parataxis session will be available later this link. However, you can see some of the slides below.

I think, Pivot concept is an interesting experiment. Excel paradigm is very popular. At the same time, customer demands towards simple and clean user interfaces in PDM/PLM systems are very strong. Pivot can put lights on some potential in more deep exploration of Excel capabilities. Some of the visual representations in Pivot are similar to existing PLM products. Filtering and pivoting functionality is strong and interesting. To get information into Pivot can be challenging in my view.

What is my conclusion? PLM Pivot experiment requires attentions. Usability in PLM systems is a hard problem.Despite all claims mainstream customers are dissatisfied.  I’m very interesting to hear what do you think about this example? As usual, I’m looking forward to your comments.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 December, 2022

The PLM industry is finally moving a full speed ahead toward the cloud. Remember the cloud debates 10 years ago?...

17 June, 2011

One of the products I had a chance to review more closely earlier this week was PTC Social Link. I...

19 December, 2012

Bill of Material is one of the fundamental things in engineering, manufacturing and product development. Whatever topic you start discussing,...

28 April, 2017

To speak about value of PLM is a tough job. I did it many time in my previous life –...

9 October, 2017

Engineering.com article – 4 Things Users Hate Most About Their CAD Systems came to my reading list over the weekend. Take...

6 December, 2008

  How to improve PLM processes before PLM system using BPMN. In many situations when I talked with customers they...

25 May, 2010

A short note on WorldCAD Access by Ralf Grabowski got my attention few days ago. In a very competitive world...

22 July, 2017

   by  kosmolaut  For many years, midsize manufacturing companies were underserved by PDM and PLM vendors. First it was about CAD...

13 April, 2020

Sunday quarantine time is the best moment to reflect on the history of PLM and future trends. Lionel Grealou gave...

Blogroll

To the top