A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels

COFES 2010, Maieutic Parataxis and PLM Excels
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
20 April, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I hope you know about my “love and hate” relationships with Excel. I posted many times about how deep Excel integrated into current CAD/PDM/PLM software life. Think about that, for the moment. You are getting Bill of Materials and Design Tables in CAD using Excel, lots of reports, catalogs and other data. There are lots of other reasons too. Just as an example you can take a look on one of my old “Excel” posts – Why Do I like My PLM Excel Spreadsheets?

About few months ago, I found an interesting Microsoft Live Lab product called “Pivot“. I posted about that. You can see my original post via this link. My initial thoughts were about how to try this pivot functionality on the real PLM data to see what is possible to achieve. Fortunately, this blog post got into attention of Simon Floyd from Microsoft, and he made this experiment. Last week at COFES 2010 during Maieutic Parataxis session, Simon presented his experiments. Full presentation from Maieutic Parataxis session will be available later this link. However, you can see some of the slides below.

I think, Pivot concept is an interesting experiment. Excel paradigm is very popular. At the same time, customer demands towards simple and clean user interfaces in PDM/PLM systems are very strong. Pivot can put lights on some potential in more deep exploration of Excel capabilities. Some of the visual representations in Pivot are similar to existing PLM products. Filtering and pivoting functionality is strong and interesting. To get information into Pivot can be challenging in my view.

What is my conclusion? PLM Pivot experiment requires attentions. Usability in PLM systems is a hard problem.Despite all claims mainstream customers are dissatisfied.  I’m very interesting to hear what do you think about this example? As usual, I’m looking forward to your comments.

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 September, 2024

Open Source PLM topic was coming in my blog a few times in the past. The topic was quite popular...

12 April, 2018

SAP is changing their business model. Engineering.com article – First of its Kind: New SAP Pricing Model is Based on...

28 August, 2014

Continue the topic of efficient communication started yesterday about future of the email for engineers, I want to speak about...

2 June, 2015

Data was always a core part of what manufacturing does. Manufacturing companies have lots of data. According to Joanna Schloss...

6 April, 2010

I’d like to put a short note this morning. It comes from my review of Patently Apple blog. The very...

30 October, 2011

Let me ask you a very silly question? How many times you abandoned you official company policy for data sharing...

22 March, 2016

Engineering.com article Winners and Losers When Industry Giant Bosch Consolidates CAD and PLM shed some lights on the recent announcement of...

27 July, 2015

I keep following new cloud software outfit Fra.me. Few months ago, at Siemens PLM conference, I’ve seen how SolidEdge runs...

28 August, 2022

My attention was caught by the GrabCAD blog announcing a fond farewell to GrabCAD Workbench. I’ve been following GrabCAD for...

Blogroll

To the top