A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Model: Granularity, Bottom-Up and Change

PLM Model: Granularity, Bottom-Up and Change
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Few weeks ago, I had chance to post about PLM Data Model. I think, PLM space has a real lack of discussions about data modeling. It seems to me, PLM vendors and developers are too focused on process management, user experience and other catchy trends. At the same time, everybody forgot that data model is bread and butter of every PDM/PLM implementation. I want to open some debates about what I see missing in current PLM data models.

Granularity
I’m very happy, this word started to catch up attention of people. It came in multiple discussions I had last time with some of the colleagues in the CAD/PDM/PLM software domain. Chis mentioned in it his Vuuch (www.blog.vuuch.com) blog. Al Dean also had chance to talk about it on his Develop3D (www.develop3d.com). One of the problems in PLM is a diversity of implementation and needs. PLM tools implemented lots of functional goodies over the past decade. However, the customization becomes a mess. It looks to me, current data model organization is outdated in most of PLM systems these days.  The last revolution PDM/PLM made was about 15 years ago when the notion of “a flexible data model” was introduced. Today, the next step should be done.

Bottom-up
How to build an efficient data model for PLM implementation? How to build a model that answers to the specific customer needs. Current vendor’s proposal is to make a selection from the list of all possible “modules”. It comes in a form of “best practices”. In my view, it is really “bad” practices. Selecting of big data model chunks put too many model constraints and create compatibility problems. The idea of bottom-up data modeling relies on the capability to define very granular pieces of data and grow bottom up in building a model that reflects customer needs.

Cost of Change
What is the most killing factor in today’s PDM/PLM software. In my view, it is cost of change. PLM models become not flexible and keep lots of dependencies on PLM system implementations. The future, in my view, is building very granular functional services alongside with the bottom up data model schema. It will allow to decrease cost of change, reduce dependencies between components and in the end, reduce a cost of change.

What is my conclusion? I think, technology matters. Without thinking about technologies, PLM won’t be able to make a next leapfrog. It becomes urgent. PLM model is a natural starting point to improve PLM implementation.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 February, 2018

One of my readers, asked me earlier today why PLM ISVs are not talking much about paradigm shift. I thought...

19 December, 2019

I’m a big fan of simplicity. What made me to believe in simplicity? I think it came with the experience....

9 June, 2009

The weekend normally puts me into a much deeper thinking mode about what to discuss on PLMtwine. Since the post...

8 September, 2019

There is an elephant in the room – PLM vendors business models are built for data locking. You can hear...

13 January, 2010

Last year I had chance to blog about why PLM Is Too Complex To Mashup? Thinking about Enterprise PLM implementations,...

9 September, 2011

During the past months, I’ve seen an increased amount of conversations about the future of App Store software model in...

10 November, 2009

Few months ago, in this post, I had chance to discuss the future of immersive CAD and Data Management. Looking...

4 February, 2015

3D printing is changing the way we can manufacturing products. Which potentially means changes in how companies are going to...

21 May, 2017

I learned yesterday that integration is ranked more important then security with end users in ongoing CIMdata cloud PLM survey....

Blogroll

To the top