A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Model: Granularity, Bottom-Up and Change

PLM Model: Granularity, Bottom-Up and Change
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Few weeks ago, I had chance to post about PLM Data Model. I think, PLM space has a real lack of discussions about data modeling. It seems to me, PLM vendors and developers are too focused on process management, user experience and other catchy trends. At the same time, everybody forgot that data model is bread and butter of every PDM/PLM implementation. I want to open some debates about what I see missing in current PLM data models.

Granularity
I’m very happy, this word started to catch up attention of people. It came in multiple discussions I had last time with some of the colleagues in the CAD/PDM/PLM software domain. Chis mentioned in it his Vuuch (www.blog.vuuch.com) blog. Al Dean also had chance to talk about it on his Develop3D (www.develop3d.com). One of the problems in PLM is a diversity of implementation and needs. PLM tools implemented lots of functional goodies over the past decade. However, the customization becomes a mess. It looks to me, current data model organization is outdated in most of PLM systems these days.  The last revolution PDM/PLM made was about 15 years ago when the notion of “a flexible data model” was introduced. Today, the next step should be done.

Bottom-up
How to build an efficient data model for PLM implementation? How to build a model that answers to the specific customer needs. Current vendor’s proposal is to make a selection from the list of all possible “modules”. It comes in a form of “best practices”. In my view, it is really “bad” practices. Selecting of big data model chunks put too many model constraints and create compatibility problems. The idea of bottom-up data modeling relies on the capability to define very granular pieces of data and grow bottom up in building a model that reflects customer needs.

Cost of Change
What is the most killing factor in today’s PDM/PLM software. In my view, it is cost of change. PLM models become not flexible and keep lots of dependencies on PLM system implementations. The future, in my view, is building very granular functional services alongside with the bottom up data model schema. It will allow to decrease cost of change, reduce dependencies between components and in the end, reduce a cost of change.

What is my conclusion? I think, technology matters. Without thinking about technologies, PLM won’t be able to make a next leapfrog. It becomes urgent. PLM model is a natural starting point to improve PLM implementation.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 May, 2023

ChatGPT is generating a lot of buzz in different industries and I’m sure you’re asking yourself how ChatGPT can help...

31 December, 2023

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems represent the foundation of the product development and business processes....

31 May, 2017

If you want to get up to speed with everything going on in technology, navigate to Kleiner Perkins venture partner...

5 July, 2021

Data is at the center of digital transformation projects. Questions about how to organize the data in the most efficient...

25 February, 2014

Metadata is “data about data”. If you stay long with PDM industry, you probably remember how earlier EDM/PDM software defined...

18 April, 2025

Why fast-moving product development teams need a new playbook for PLM? Manufacturing industry is evolving and looking how to keep...

28 September, 2018

It is a bit unusual blog for me. Last year, I published few articles that triggered discussions in PLM blogs....

28 February, 2021

Monica Schnitger is asking a question about SaaS dominance in PLM following the PTC acquisition of Arena Solutions. Check her...

9 June, 2014

Silos is an interesting topic in enterprise software. And it is a very important topic for product lifecycle management. Why...

Blogroll

To the top