A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Model: Granularity, Bottom-Up and Change

PLM Model: Granularity, Bottom-Up and Change
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
3 May, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Few weeks ago, I had chance to post about PLM Data Model. I think, PLM space has a real lack of discussions about data modeling. It seems to me, PLM vendors and developers are too focused on process management, user experience and other catchy trends. At the same time, everybody forgot that data model is bread and butter of every PDM/PLM implementation. I want to open some debates about what I see missing in current PLM data models.

Granularity
I’m very happy, this word started to catch up attention of people. It came in multiple discussions I had last time with some of the colleagues in the CAD/PDM/PLM software domain. Chis mentioned in it his Vuuch (www.blog.vuuch.com) blog. Al Dean also had chance to talk about it on his Develop3D (www.develop3d.com). One of the problems in PLM is a diversity of implementation and needs. PLM tools implemented lots of functional goodies over the past decade. However, the customization becomes a mess. It looks to me, current data model organization is outdated in most of PLM systems these days.  The last revolution PDM/PLM made was about 15 years ago when the notion of “a flexible data model” was introduced. Today, the next step should be done.

Bottom-up
How to build an efficient data model for PLM implementation? How to build a model that answers to the specific customer needs. Current vendor’s proposal is to make a selection from the list of all possible “modules”. It comes in a form of “best practices”. In my view, it is really “bad” practices. Selecting of big data model chunks put too many model constraints and create compatibility problems. The idea of bottom-up data modeling relies on the capability to define very granular pieces of data and grow bottom up in building a model that reflects customer needs.

Cost of Change
What is the most killing factor in today’s PDM/PLM software. In my view, it is cost of change. PLM models become not flexible and keep lots of dependencies on PLM system implementations. The future, in my view, is building very granular functional services alongside with the bottom up data model schema. It will allow to decrease cost of change, reduce dependencies between components and in the end, reduce a cost of change.

What is my conclusion? I think, technology matters. Without thinking about technologies, PLM won’t be able to make a next leapfrog. It becomes urgent. PLM model is a natural starting point to improve PLM implementation.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 October, 2013

Everybody speaks today about big data. It is probably one of the most overhyped and confused terms. It goes everywhere...

13 December, 2018

For many years PLM and ERP were like water and oil. One is positioned for innovation and another is positioned...

10 January, 2019

PLM was started few decades ago and it looks like coming to some sort of mid-life crisis. I can see...

3 April, 2012

Disclosure: As a co-founder of Inforbix, I understand that my opinion about PLM Data and Search can be unintentionally biased....

15 March, 2025

The future of PLM isn’t just about managing data—it’s about making data work for people. I’m excited to be speaking...

20 August, 2015

Collaboration in is an interesting topic. Whether you are a 3-person team or a 10,000 person OEM manufacturing company, some...

2 March, 2019

Earlier this week my attention was caught by Siemens PLM tweet message claiming the definition of low-cost PLM. Check this...

19 August, 2013

The technology trends are interesting these days. You think what can be more disruptive than cloud. Indeed, cloud, social and...

9 January, 2014

Do you remember my PLM and Internet of Things article back in 2009? Four years ago it was a dream. However,...

Blogroll

To the top