A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Competition and “MEH”?

PLM Competition and “MEH”?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 June, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I’ve been reading SolidSmack postJim Heppelmann. Dassault Arrogant Competition. Siemens Invisible. This post made me think more about competition.  Competition is very important and this is a part of any healthy industry. So, I want to suggest a short discussion about PLM competition and modern competitive strategies. The way companies behave, can show what are their motto, believes, technological position.

Blue Ocean Strategies
If you haven’t had chance to read this book, I highly recommend you to do so. In my view, it can be considered as a modern “bible of competition”. You can find lots of interesting examples from the past and present about how companies managed their competitive strategies. The blue ocean metaphor explains the world of competition-less, where companies are focused on untapped market places, new opportunity for growths and compare it with the dominant competition strategy (red-ocean) of finding ways to cut costs and growth by taking a market share from competition.

MEH and Competition
Relax, ‘MEH’ is not a new PLM  TLA (three letter acronym) for a new super technology that will outperform all other competitors. Take a look in urban dictionary definition of “meh”. It states for “Indifference; to be used when one simply does not care.” It seems to me, MEH is going to be a new way to compete in the world when software will be available for PULL and vendors will stop PUSHING it to potential customers. I want to credit Steven Arnold KMWorld article about Google and their MEH strategy in mobile phone space. Time will show if Android will be able to outperform iPhone and RIM. This is an interesting perspective, though.

PLM Competition
PLM and associated space of CAD, CAM, CAE is not simple from a competition standpoint. In my view, the most problematic aspects of PLM-related competition are customer’s lock-in on software, sotware versions, data formats. Cost of change (or switch to a competitor’s solution) is another thing that plays as a competitive factor. On the other side, customers are starting to be tired of such competition and looking for alternatives to get the job done.

What is my short conclusion today? I think, PLM market is too focused on competition and less focused on customers. To be able to listen to customers is probably the first tool to win a competition game. PLM competition needs to learn from how to win over customers and not over competitors. This is not a simple shift. However, this is one that needs to be done to make PLM associated industry stronger.

Just my thoughts..
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 December, 2010

I’ve seen a new splash in the discussion around PLM out-of-the-box during the last couple of weeks. The initial hit...

6 July, 2011

One of the topics that people often ask is what is the difference between PDM and PLM. The question is...

21 January, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended a PLM Spotlight session organized by PI DX. If you missed my earlier blog, please...

28 December, 2013

Cloud PLM is a not a new word any more. Established vendors and newcomers in PLM world are developing strategies...

23 May, 2022

Design control issues can be a common problem in manufacturing companies. These problems can arise when multiple versions of a...

11 November, 2011

Have you had a chance to read about cloud in Pig Latin? No? Actually, I did. Recently, I came across...

2 December, 2014

Technology can help us to expand horizons of possible and impossible. I’ve been experiencing this expansion earlier today while watching...

3 July, 2014

I’m sure most of you are familiar with XP (Extreme Programming) – software development methodology, which intent to improve software...

28 August, 2018

I’m officially coming back online after a week of cooling down during family vacation in Iceland. Apologizing for absence of...

Blogroll

To the top