A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open PLM – A Climb For Losers?

Open PLM – A Climb For Losers?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
8 July, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Almost two months ago, I had a chance to read a blog article by Mobile Beat with some intriguing name “Open is for losers” by Dave McClure. Take a look and form your opinion. Understanding the overall intention to provoke a good discussion around this topic, I decided to follow this blog post in some time to read discussion and see people’s opinion on this topic. It happened that independently some of PLM Think Tank posts generated some interesting discussion related to the topic of Openness.

Closed Thoughts About PLM Openness

Open vs. Closed PLM Debates

Today, I want to get back and discuss how I see the future of openness in PLM and Engineering Software.

Standards, Formats, Data Models

The discussion about standards and formats is life long. Do you think CAD and PLM industry will be able to generate a reasonable quality standard answering to the needs of industry? Discussions in this field are varying from request to develop independent formats and ends up by requests to disclosure existing data models, formats, etc. I don’t think these discussions may produce results in near future. The development of common formats and models is too expensive and, in the end, will require to have a set of tools to work with. The interesting potential will be to borrow some of the emerging web technologies.

APIs, Toolkits and Platforms

API is the most referenced way to make software open. Combined with a set of patterns, technologies and buzzwords, this is probably the way to do it in real life. The biggest remaining problem in this space is reliability and compliance of these APIs within the time. In addition, APIs and other internal mechanisms are under heavy licensing by vendors. I don’t see any silver bullet these days that can make any major improvements in this space.

Applications and Solutions

The reality of a current situation is that customers are working with multiple applications, products and solutions. In many situations, I can see no interest for a particular vendor to enable easy data migration from one tool to another. Therefore, we can see multiple software vendors or service providers that can help customers to solve this problem.

What is my conclusion today? How To Climb To Open PLM? This is the most important question that needs to be asked collectively in the industry. I think, the industry movement into PLM openness is the indicator of industry maturity. I can see ups and downs on this road. A critical mass of openness needs to be delivered by vendors to turn on the switch of benefits from open PLM. Multiple established vendors and newcomers will need to invest enough resources to make it happen. The remaining players will be able to deliver better solutions. Some of them can probably die on the road. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
24 August, 2015

Our everyday business life is changing. Remember sales people with rolodexes that helped you to find right contacts? I’m sure...

26 May, 2021

I started my series of articles about PLM and ERP by speaking about PLM vs ERP Tug of War, continued...

6 July, 2012

‘Alte Zachen’ means ‘old stuff’ in Yiddish. ‘Alte’ (old) and ‘Zachen’ (thing). When I was a child, I remember a...

28 February, 2019

My attention was caught by ABI Research Report Whitepaper shared by PTC. Check this out –5 Steps to Master Digital Transformation. Here...

28 May, 2015

Mary Meeker of Kleiner Perkins shared her (almost) traditional presentation about internet trends yesterday. The presentation is available here –...

24 September, 2013

Have you had a chance to speak about cloud technology in Europe? If you did, I’m sure you had a...

27 September, 2016

My attention was caught by Engineering.com article – eBook: Putting PLM Within Reach. The write-up introduces Jim Brown’s ebook. The...

8 April, 2019

I continue to share my thoughts and impression from last week SuiteWorld 2019 event. If you missed some of my...

24 April, 2009

I’m getting back to the topic of persistent storage of PLM data. In my previous posts, I touched on this...

Blogroll

To the top