A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

3DLive, 3DHD, 3D UI and Efficiency

3DLive, 3DHD, 3D UI and Efficiency
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 July, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I read Jim Brown’s Can Siemens Make More Fun with HD-PLM? Jim is writing about the future of PLM experience. I made me think about User Experience (or User Interface) efficiency for engineers and potentially other users in the organization.

3D Navigation Trend
I think, comprehensive 3D Navigation is definitely a trend that PLM vendors developed for the last couple of years. The two most significant products for me that created this trend are DS 3DLive and Siemens 3DHD (or HD PLM – still need to figure out the difference).  Take a look on the following two video fragments.

Dassault Systems 3DLive

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0-Y3yzNQZQ]

Siemens PLM 3D HD

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=99YohI1cSFE&]

User Experience and Efficiency
Both 3D Live and 3D HD user interfaces made me think about engineer’s work efficiency. One of the most significant value propositions of such user experience is the ability to bring contextual information linked to the graphical (or 3D, if you will) representation of product. I believe, the main driver behind this user experience is the need to improve the engineer’s efficiency when they work in a complex design environment.

What is my conclusion? I think, PLM vendors are trying to innovate in the space of user experience and to improve efficiency of engineering work with such a type of environments. In the end, it is all about how to keep an engineer’s focus in a single UI and bring all relevant information in the context of this user interface. The underline work is impressive. I didn’t find the answer on the question how such type of software is going to be implemented on a customer site. Both 3DLive and 3DHD provide some access to the information outside of design space. To make hand-wiring behind these UIs will be not a simple task, in my view. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 July, 2016

Until now we had enough said about “cloud”. While PLM vendors are still disputing what is a true and false...

2 January, 2022

Happy New Year! 2022 is here and now it is a great time to share some of my thoughts about...

26 July, 2012

The discussion around SolidSmack’s article PLM Should Be Like Google. Really? is heating up. My PLM blogging buddy and well-known...

21 January, 2024

In the rapidly evolving landscape of industrial processes, the digital transformation has become a pivotal focus. This shift demands a...

18 March, 2011

Collaboration is one of the most overused words in Product Lifecycle Management. Even outside of PLM world, this term creates...

22 April, 2013

The last decade was all about 2.0. To me, 2.0 trend was about how to re-think existing norms and behaviors,...

29 June, 2010

My post Open vs. Closed PLM Debates last week and related Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt –...

11 May, 2016

Collaboration was an important element in the development of product lifecycle technologies. First PDM and PLM systems allowed to control...

15 April, 2009

I’d like to get back to Excel discussion. I think that Excel is a really good application. And I don’t...

Blogroll

To the top