A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM+ERP: Outside of Equations?

PLM+ERP: Outside of Equations?
Oleg
Oleg
23 November, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I’ve been watching a recorded webinar with a fascinating name: PLM+ERP = Manufacturing Success. The tweet about this webinar caught my attention. Navigate your browser to the following link to get an access to the recording. You need to register. I registered my blog as a media company. In addition, I failed to run webinar videoe in both Safari and Chrome on my MacBook. FireFox was okay. Later, I’ve seen that video streaming is using SilverLight plug-ins, which made me think about Silverlight portability and future Microsoft strategy with HTML5.

PTC+Microsoft: Webinar

This webinar is organized by PTC and Microsoft and help of IBIS, Microsoft partner. You will have an intensive and deep set of information about what PTC, Microsoft Dynamics and IBIS. There is a mix of sale, marketing and user. The most valuable, in my view, is the last part where you can see a demo of scenario with involvement of both systems – Windchill and AX. I put few slides below that did catch my attention.

PLM+ERP

I remember this formula for the last 10 years. The combination of PLM and ERP systems working together was a permanent challenge for mid-size and bigger companies that were thinking about how to streamline processes in the organization. If you will follow slides and webinar video, you will see all logical steps by organizing processes and data flow between PLM and ERP systems. The complication of organizing the process is high. It would be interesting to understand the effort needed to organize such integration. This is a key question, in my view.

Wrong Equation?

The webinar and demo made me think about how to streamline processes in the organization. The traditional and very often used way to solve the PLM+ERP equation is to make data flow between systems. It requires a significant amount of work in organizing these processes. Hard-wiring of data, connecting events, sending messages, screening exchange logs. Systems are working according to its own rules. Push/Pull of data is complicated. The overall system is very sensitive to changes and requires baby-sitting. The system can function. However, significant resources need to be spent to keep it up-and-running.

What is my conclusion? One of the fundamental principles behind PLM+ERP equation is an event driven process push. Many manufacturing companies and software vendors got into this for the last 10-15 years. It was an obvious way to solve PLM+ERP equation.  It makes systems dependent and costly to manage. One of the fundamental ideas that may improve it is to get out of this equation. The name of the idea is “Pull”. Pull can make systems independent and much easy managed. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 March, 2010

I was watching Mentor Graphics presentation yesterday about their Valor acquisition. If you haven’t had a chance to watch it,...

15 March, 2011

Cloud is continuously discussed among the people in CAD/PLM industry. The opinions are varying and discussion is going up and...

30 September, 2017

Almost 2 years ago I asked a question – How many PDM systems SOLIDWORKS users need? I counted five PDM systems....

26 August, 2010

I read one of the latest VEKTORRUM re-posts about Autodesk and PLM. Navigate your browser to the following link and read...

25 September, 2010

I’m coming late this month with my top 5 post. It was mostly caused by me attending two conferences as...

3 January, 2018

Believe it or not, each manufacturing company has PLM. If your company is in the business of design, product development...

21 April, 2024

Data is the lifeblood and foundation of product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions. In a world where data management is quickly...

27 January, 2014

CAD/PDM integration is a very important topic. It is a piece of software that helps to establish a connection between...

1 April, 2016

PLM software is hard to interact with. I think the hardest part is PLM workflows. Usually very sophisticated it creates...

Blogroll

To the top