A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM and SharePoint Scalability

PLM and SharePoint Scalability
Oleg
Oleg
14 March, 2011 | 1 min for reading

Since Microsoft first released MOSS 2007, I can see an increased amount of manufacturing companies are investigating a potential move to SharePoint. Microsoft used brilliant freemium strategy and decided to give away a basic version of SharePoint (WSS – Windows SharePoint Services) bundled to Windows Server license. It created a significant flow of SharePoint viral evaluations in companies. Because of deployment and implementation ease, many companies started to implement WSS to improve the ability to share data and streamline collaboration. Sometimes, the solution growths can be really spontaneous.

I found the link published by Paul Andrew of Microsoft, very useful to evaluate your need and check upfront if your organizational demand and scale can fit SharePoint boundaries. The following two documents Estimate Performance and Capacity Requirements for Large Scale Document Repositories and SharePoint Server 2010 capacity management: Software boundaries and limits will take you to a long journey of planning an appropriate environment for your future SharePoint implementations.

During last few years, some PLM vendors and their partners made a bet on SharePoint as a platform to mainstream PLM deployment in organizations. User experience and IT compliance are two factors that made a significant influence on vendors, partners and companies. Such products as Windchill ProductPoint or TeamCenter Community are completely relying on Office and SharePoint platform as an infrastructure.

What is my conclusion? Microsoft SharePoint is a large a complicated platform. Sometimes, I can see people having some illusions with regards how easy they can deploy SharePoint based solution for their product development needs. To check detailed SharePoint pre-requisites and make sizing of your drawings and other product-related information is obvious, but important. Just my thoughts..

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
15 July, 2016

PLM is transforming from pure engineering discipline into platform capable to manage a diverse set of data and processes. I...

11 July, 2011

Autodesk and PLM. Do you think these two words have something in common? I had a chance to discuss this...

8 February, 2013

Data is a trending topic these days. Big Data is even fascinating. It made me think about the meaning of...

12 December, 2014

PLM selection is complex process. It takes time to make a decision, evaluate, build a pilot and implement PLM system....

29 June, 2016

One of the news that caught my attention yesterday was Autodesk announcement to acquire CADSoft Eagle PCB design tool from...

12 September, 2021

As products are getting more complex and connected, the question of what systems are needed to support such complex development...

2 July, 2008

Some thought about how PLM 2.0 technologies will impact future product development communities and processes. Who is winner? My conclusion...

22 June, 2016

When customers don’t purchase product or services, the typical assumption that sales lost to their competitor. But in reality, the...

6 March, 2014

Identifications, Part Numbers, Documents, Revisions. Despite initial simplicity these terms are often create confusion in organizations and lead to additional...

Blogroll

To the top